Because the club football seasons reaches a dramatic climax, an unexpected spying scandal has emerged within the Championship so as to add to the tensions.
Southampton and Middlesbrough met within the Championship play-offs after ending fourth and fifth within the league table respectively.
Ahead of the primary leg on the Riverside Stadium on Saturday, Middlesbrough accused their opponents of spying on one in every of their training sessions.
The English Football League (EFL) took the allegations seriously, charged Southampton with spying and launched an investigation.
Since then each legs of the play-off clash have been played, with the primary in Middlesbrough ending goalless, before Southampton dramatically won the second 2-1 during extra-time.
The Saints have booked their place at Wembley for the play-off final, where they’re as a consequence of play Hull City, however the scandal hangs over them.
Here’s what we all know happened and what punishment could come Southampton’s way.
What has happened?
The alleged spying took place on Thursday May 7 at Middlesbrough’s training base at Rockliffe Hall.
Boro’s training ground is attached to a hotel and golf course, so is well accessible by members of the general public.
The BBC report that the ‘spy’ simply parked on the golf club and walked to a vantage point overlooking the training session.
The person was reportedly pointing his phone on the training session, with an image of that scene now being revealed by the Day by day Mail.
The onlooker was reportedly approached by a Middlesbrough member of staff, but refused to discover himself and ran away.
Photos were taken of the person and he was captured on CCTV, with Boro confident that he was a member of Southampton staff.
Now the image has publicly emerged, he has been identified as Southampton analyst William Salt.
He may only be an intern with the Saints, but Salt is taken into account a vital member of Southampton manager Tonda Eckert’s team, pictured with the boss as he won February’s Championship Manager of the Month award.
The Day by day Mail report that Salt has left evidence of his presence at Rockliffe Hall by paying on card for a coffee on the golf club.
What have Southampton said?
The clubs shouldn’t be admitting to anything, although they are saying they’re cooperating with the EFL investigation and carrying out their very own internal process.
In an announcement on Tuesday, Southampton chief executive, Phil Parsons, said: ‘The club is fully cooperating with the EFL and the disciplinary commission, whilst also undertaking an internal review to be sure that all facts and context are properly understood.
‘Given the intensity of the fixture schedule and the short turnaround between matches, we’ve requested time to finish that process thoroughly and responsibly. We understand the discussion and speculation that has followed over recent days, but we also consider it’s important that the total context is established before conclusions are drawn.’
Manager Eckert has been pressed on the subject in press conferences, but has insisted he’s unable to comment.
‘It’s challenging for me to not comment. There’s just nothing that I can say in the mean time since it is an ongoing investigation,’ he said.
‘We’re taking the matter very seriously and I’ll say something. I just can’t say it now.’
He added: ‘I feel this whole matter is overshadowing two games.
‘I might hope that the best way we discuss that offers credit to the standard of the games and when the investigation is closed I’ll say something.’
As frustrations grew amongst journalists present, Eckert was asked if he’s a cheat, causing the manager to go away the press conference and a member of staff telling a reporter to ‘show some respect’.
Could the Saints be punished?
Yes.
An independent commission is carrying out the investigation and will hand out a variety of punishments if Southampton are found guilty.
A punishment may very well be as stiff as throwing Southampton out of the play-offs, or imposing one other sporting sanction which is able to come into play next season.
The club is also fined. The commission can provide you with whatever punishment they deem fit.
When’s the play-off final?
The independent commission have to act fast because the Championship play-off final is on May 23 at Wembley.
At this stage, Southampton’s position in the sport is up within the air.
Has anything like this happened before?
Absolutely. Most notably at Leeds United under the management of Marcelo Bielsa who was spying on an epic scale.
Ahead of a game with Derby County in January 2019 a Leeds scout was apprehended on the Rams training ground and Bielsa revealed he had spied on the training sessions of each opponent he had faced that season.
‘I observed all of the rivals we played against and watched the training sessions of all opponents,’ said Bielsa on the time.
‘So why did I send someone to look at them? Simply because I assumed I wasn’t violating the norm. All the knowledge I would like to make clear [my tactics] I gather without watching the training session of the opponent … but we feel guilty if we don’t work enough. Watching it [the opponents training] allows us to have less anxiety and, in my case, I’m silly enough to permit this sort of behaviour.’
On the time there was no rule covering spying and Leeds were only charged with breaching a regulation requiring clubs must act in ‘utmost good faith’ to one another.
Leeds were fined £200,000 for the wrongdoing.
Since then the EFL established regulation 127, which states ‘no club shall directly or not directly observe (or try and observe) one other club’s training session within the period of 72 hours prior to any match’.
MORE: Why are Southampton wearing yellow kit with no names against Man City in FA Cup?