Manchester United great Gary Neville has accused Sir Jim Ratcliffe of ‘providing an umbrella’ for the barrage of criticism directed on the Glazer family.
Ratcliffe has turn into the general public face of United ever since he took up a minority stake within the club in February 2024.
Despite his investment, Ratcliffe has made a string of unpopular decisions to balance the books amid United’s dwindling performances on the sphere this season.
Ratcliffe has overseen a whole bunch of redundancies, reduced food options for non-playing staff at Carrington to soup and sandwiches, increased season ticket prices and controversially axed legendary manager Sir Alex Ferguson’s paid ambassadorial role to call three.
A lot of these have are available the wake of United’s alarming Q2 fiscal results being revealed, which confirmed the club paid an eye-watering £14.5million to sack Erik ten Hag in October.
This was despite Ratcliffe overseeing the choice handy Ten Hag a brand new deal in the summertime following the Red Devils’ upset win over Manchester City in the FA Cup final.
Nonetheless, in an interview with Ratcliffe on Sky Sports, Neville felt the blame for a lot of United’s off-field woes ought to be pointed on the Glazers, who’ve owned the club since May 2005.
Neville, who has been a staunch critic of the Glazer family for years, asked Ratcliffe whether he had ever questioned why the Americans seem reluctant to pump any of their very own money into the club.
“It isn’t the answer to maintain throwing money at the issue” Ratcliffe said.
“You’ve got got to get the home so as. If you happen to have a look at the explanation the debt is at the extent it’s for the time being, that is increased by £330million within the last 4 years since the club’s been spending so rather more than its earning.
“It is a bloated organisation.”
Ratcliffe explained the explanation why the club has been plunged into vast amounts of debt is due to two things.
4
talkSPORT BET: Latest Cheltenham Festival odds and free bet offers
“The prices of running the club have undergone the roof,” Ratcliffe said.
“The expenditure on the squad has undergone the roof and the salary bill has undergone the roof. And the performances have declined.
“They bet the bank on Champions League, but it surely hasn’t happened.”
Ratcliffe, who insists he has ‘a really skilled relationship’ with the Glazers, added the family allow him and the remainder of United’s top brass to ‘get on with it’.
Despite Ratcliffe’s explanations, Neville hit back.
Neville identified Ratcliffe was ‘now beginning to get the flak they’ve (Glazer’s) been getting.
4
“You are providing an umbrella over their heads,” Neville said.
Ratcliffe didn’t refute Neville’s claim but defended his actions, insisting ‘people never like change.’
“They just like the established order, they’d much prefer if people stick their head within the sand and hope it’s going to go away, but it surely won’t,” Ratcliffe said.
“Change requires some unpopular decisions. I feel I actually have to simply accept that I’ll be unpopular. I do not know the way long I’ll be unpopular, perhaps I will be unpopular for a protracted period time.
“But I feel it’s value being unpopular to fight our way through the changes which are vital to get Manchester United back to where it ought to be.
“And hopefully the attitude will change a bit if we come out the opposite side with a successful consequence.”
Neville continued to rally against the Glazer’s, claiming that 20 years ago United had “the very best stadium within the country, the very best training ground within the country, the very best team within the country and were debt-free.”
Yet Ratcliffe believed the finger of blame ought to be pointed to the management groups that preceded his arrival fairly than the family.
“If you happen to have a look at among the other characters in English football which are owners, and you already know them thoroughly, they’re heavily involved in all of the running of the club,” Ratcliffe said.
“They gave management an awful lot of rope, an excessive amount of rope, obviously. However the previous two teams of management should take a number of the blame for the selections they made.
“They should, I’m afraid. It isn’t just the Glazer family. They’ve not been involved in a level of detail.”
Neville blasted the Glazer’s lack of interest in wanting to know the finer details of how the club was run and branded it ‘negligence.’
4
“You are involved in the extent of detail and also you’re having to correct their mistakes,” Neville said.
“In the event that they’ve not overseen the club within the last ten years to the purpose where it’s run out of money, that is negligence.
“You already know that higher than anybody.”
Yet Ratcliffe preferred to look towards the longer term and is adamant the club will emerge ‘in a much sunnier place.’
Nonetheless, as Ratcliffe outlined throughout, United fans may should be prepared for darker days at Old Trafford before the sun peeps its head from out of the clouds.
