European Union watchdogs fined Apple and Meta tons of of tens of millions of euros Wednesday as they stepped up enforcement of the 27-nation bloc’s digital competition rules.
The European Commission imposed a 500 million euro (US$571 million) advantageous on Apple for stopping app makers from pointing users to cheaper options outside its App Store.
The commission, which is the EU’s executive arm, also fined Meta Platforms 200 million euros since it forced Facebook and Instagram users to make a choice from seeing personalized ads or paying to avoid them.
The punishments were smaller than the blockbuster multibillion-euro fines that the commission has previously slapped on Big Tech corporations in antitrustcases.
Apple and Meta need to comply with the choices inside 60 days or risk unspecified “periodic penalty payments,” the commission said.
The choices were expected to are available March, however the self-imposed deadline slipped amid an escalating trans-Atlantic trade war with U.S. President Donald Trump, who has repeatedly complained about regulations from Brussels affecting American corporations.
The penalties were the primary issued under the EU’s Digital Markets Act, also referred to as the DMA. It’s a sweeping rule book that amounts to a set of do’s and don’ts designed to offer consumers and businesses more alternative and forestall Big Tech “gatekeepers” from cornering digital markets.
The DMA seeks to make sure “that residents have full control over when and the way their data is used online, and businesses can freely communicate with their very own customers,” Henna Virkkunen, the commission’s executive vice chairman for tech sovereignty, said in a press release.
Get every day National news
Get the day’s top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day.
“The choices adopted today find that each Apple and Meta have taken away this free alternative from their users and are required to alter their behaviour,” Virkkunen said.
Each corporations indicated they might appeal.
Apple accused the commission of “unfairly targeting” the iPhone maker, and said it “continues to maneuver the goalposts” despite the corporate’s efforts to comply with the foundations.
Meta Chief Global Affairs Officer Joel Kaplan said in a press release that the “Commission is attempting to handicap successful American businesses while allowing Chinese and European corporations to operate under different standards.”
In a press briefing in Brussels, commission spokespeople sought to tamp down concerns that the penalties would inflame trade tensions.
“We don’t care who owns an organization. We don’t care where the corporate is situated,” commission spokesperson Thomas Regnier told reporters. “We’re totally agnostic on that front.”
“And be it a Chinese company, be an American company, or be it a European company, you’ll have to play by the foundations within the European Union.”
Within the App Store case, the Commission had accused the iPhone maker of imposing unfair rules stopping app developers from freely steering consumers to other channels.
Among the many DMA’s provisions are requirements to let developers inform customers of cheaper purchasing options and direct them to those offers.
The commission said it ordered Apple to remove technical and industrial restrictions that prevent developers from steering users to other channels, and to finish “noncompliant” conduct.
Apple said it has “spent tons of of 1000’s of engineering hours and made dozens of changes to comply with this law, none of which our users have asked for.”
“Despite countless meetings, the Commission continues to maneuver the goalposts every step of the best way,” the corporate said.
The EU’s Meta investigation centered on the corporate’s technique to comply with strict European data privacy rules by giving users the choice of paying for ad-free versions of Facebook and Instagram.
Users could pay at the very least 10 euros (US$11.40) a month to avoid being targeted by ads based on their personal data. The U.S. tech giant rolled out the choice after the European Union’s top court ruled Meta must first get consent before showing ads to users.
Regulators took issue with Meta’s model, saying it doesn’t allow users to exercise their right to “freely consent” to allowing their personal data from its various services, which also including Facebook Marketplace, WhatsApp, and Messenger, to be combined for personalized ads.
Meta rolled out a 3rd option in November giving Facebook and Instagram users in Europe the alternative to see fewer personalized ads in the event that they don’t need to pay for an ad-free subscription. The commission said it’s “currently assessing” this selection and continues to carry talks with Meta, and has asked the corporate to offer evidence of the brand new option’s impact.
“This isn’t just a few advantageous; the Commission forcing us to alter our business model effectively imposes a multibillion-dollar tariff on Meta while requiring us to supply an inferior service,” Kaplan said. “And by unfairly restricting personalized promoting the European Commission can be hurting European businesses and economies.”
The EU has already sanctioned Apple under the DMA, but it surely didn’t involve a advantageous. The bloc took motion earlier this yr to compel the corporate to open up its iPhone and iPad operating systems by outlining the steps it must take to work higher with competing technologies.
© 2025 The Canadian Press
