A brand new report is shedding light on why birth rates are falling all over the world, and suggests it comes all the way down to a “lack of alternative, not desire.”
Financial limitations, job insecurity, gender inequality, fears of the longer term and other barriers are the driving reasons behind the declines, based on latest research published Tuesday by the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA).
The report goals to ward off on “critically flawed” political and media narratives that blame women for rejecting marriage and parenthood as a consequence of a perceived lack of wanting a baby.
“Vast numbers of persons are unable to create the families they need,” the UNFPA’s executive director Natalia Kanem said in a press release.
“The difficulty is lack of alternative, not desire, with major consequences for people and societies. That’s the actual fertility crisis, and the reply lies in responding to what people say they need: paid family leave, reasonably priced fertility care, and supportive partners.”
The report draws on polling conducted by YouGov in 14 countries, representing over one-third of the worldwide population. Canada was not included within the list of nations polled, which features the USA, Mexico, India, Brazil, South Korea and Germany.
In nearly half of the countries included within the survey, fertility rates have fallen below 2.1 births per woman, which is the edge needed to keep up population stability without immigration.
The findings show few people worldwide are in a position to have the number of kids they need — even when that number is zero.
“Rates of unintended pregnancy are persistently high across regions, as are difficulties having the number of kids respondents desire,” the report says.
Twenty per cent of individuals surveyed said they’ve been pressured into having children they didn’t need to, while one in three said that they had experienced an unwanted pregnancy.
Nearly 13 per cent said that they had experienced each an unwanted pregnancy and barriers to having a desired child. In some countries, that figure was above 20 per cent.
Get breaking National news
For news impacting Canada and all over the world, join for breaking news alerts delivered on to you once they occur.
“In other words, all over the place we glance, persons are struggling to freely realize their reproductive aspirations,” the report says, noting responses were similar in countries with high and low fertility rates.
‘Financial limitations’ are top barrier
Greater than half of those surveyed said economic barriers were impacting their ability to have the number of kids they wanted.
“Financial limitations” was by far the highest economic factor identified, with 39 per cent of individuals saying so.
About one in five people said unemployment or job security was a barrier for them, while an analogous number said the identical in regards to the high cost of housing.
Moreover, greater than 20 per cent combined said concerns about climate change, wars, pandemics or other future political or social issues were stopping them from having children.
Gender-equitable child care was also identified as a barrier.
While 11 per cent of individuals said their partner wouldn’t sufficiently carry the load at home, nearly twice as many ladies said so in comparison with men. A bigger number of individuals, 14 per cent, said the shortage of an acceptable partner stood in the way in which of them having children.
More generally, one in 4 people surveyed said they felt unable to fulfil their desire for a baby at their preferred time.
Child-care costs and an absence of adequate sexual and reproductive health resources were also identified as barriers to proper family planning, based on the report.
Although Canada wasn’t surveyed within the UNFPA report, similar findings have been reported amongst Canadians.
An Angus Reid survey released last October found greater than half of potential parents said they’ve delayed having children longer than they ideally would have liked, largely as a consequence of the rising cost of living and other financial concerns.
In line with the poll, 41 per cent said the delay was due to concerns in regards to the job market and financial security, while one-third were frightened about each child-care costs and the expensive housing market.
A poll by Ipsos last 12 months found 65 per cent said they’re selecting to have smaller families because of monetary concerns.
Statistics Canada reported last 12 months that Canada’s fertility rate, which has been steadily declining, has hit a record low and the country is now among the many “lowest-low” fertility nations.
The fee of raising a baby to age 17 costs the typical Canadian family about $293,000, based on Statistics Canada — a bit of greater than $17,000 per 12 months.
Avoid ‘coercive’ measures, researchers say
The report warns against what it calls “coercive” measures to spice up birth rates comparable to fertility targets or incentives like so-called “baby bonuses.”
The researchers say that, while financial rewards might help within the short-term, they’ll further the systemic issue of forcing people to have children before they’re ready.
Financial incentives — which the report notes have been pursued in some European countries — have been openly considered within the U.S. by the Trump administration.
U.S. President Donald Trump himself has said so-called “baby bonuses” — a money reward for brand new moms — “appears like a superb idea.”
Republican lawmakers have introduced a measure called “Trump Accounts” that may fund US$1,000 investment accounts for kids born within the U.S. over the following 4 years, which those children can start accessing once they turn 18.
Trump called it a “pro-family initiative” while announcing the proposal Monday.
Shortly after his confirmation, U.S. Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy circulated a memo that instructed his department to prioritize families by, amongst other things, giving preference to communities with marriage and birth rates higher than the national average when awarding grants.
The UNFPA report argues policymakers should as an alternative pursue long-term initiatives that give families the liberty to make their very own family-planning decisions. These include investing in reasonably priced housing, mandating paid parental leave and ensuring full access to reproductive health services and abortion care.
Societal changes are also needed, the report says, comparable to encouraging men to totally take part in child care and family planning.
—With files from Global’s Anne Gaviola
