Unlock the Editor’s Digest totally free
Roula Khalaf, Editor of the FT, selects her favourite stories on this weekly newsletter.
Most British firms would withstand sharply higher tariffs even when their earnings fell 10 per cent and their borrowing costs surged, in keeping with the Bank of England’s assessment of risks from US President Donald Trump’s trade war.
“Despite some pockets of vulnerability, UK corporates would, in aggregate, give you the option to service their debts even within the face of further global shocks resembling lower global demand and provide,” the BoE said in its latest financial stability report published on Wednesday.
UK firms which are more exposed to the danger of a trade shock account for about 60 per cent of jobs within the country but only 30 per cent of corporate debt, which the central bank said showed they typically have borrowed lower than other firms.
Trump said this week that Washington would impose 50 per cent tariffs on copper, sending US prices of the economic metal soaring to record levels, in the newest escalation of his trade war.
Only the UK has secured any type of relief from the US sectoral tariffs. As a part of its recent take care of the US, Britain was granted a reduced tariff of 10 per cent on an annual quota of 100,000 cars, as an alternative of the 25 per cent tariff applied to most countries.
“The outlook for UK household and company resilience stays strong in aggregate, and it could take significant macroeconomic shocks for aggregate debt servicing measures to deteriorate materially,” it said.
Nonetheless, officials warned that some heavily indebted British firms reliant on market-based finance “are particularly exposed to global shocks”. They estimated that 10 per cent of market-based corporate debt would wish refinancing in the following 12 months.
The extent of capital within the UK banking system was “broadly appropriate”, the BoE said, adding that its Financial Policy Committee would perform an assessment of “the general level of capital requirements” for the primary time in five years.
The FPC had beneficial regulators “amend implementation” of its mortgage-lending restrictions by allowing lenders to extend their share of high loan-to-income lending while remaining below the 15 per cent limit, the BoE said.
Mortgages price greater than 4.5 times household income remained well below the FPC’s limit, despite rising to 9.7 per cent of total home loans in the primary quarter. The committee forecast this share would rise to 11 per cent by the top of this 12 months.
Risks to global financial stability were “still elevated” owing to geopolitical tensions, fragmentation of trade and financial markets and pressures on government debt markets, it said.
US stock markets slumped in April after Trump announced major “liberation day” tariffs on many trading partners. However the president’s decision to pause his most punishing tariffs has since prompted a rapid rebound by the S&P 500, which is now up greater than 6 per cent this 12 months.
The BoE said the recovery in equity markets meant “the danger of sharp falls in dangerous asset prices, abrupt shifts in asset allocation and a more prolonged breakdown in historical correlations stays high”.
After the dollar depreciated in recent months, breaking with its historical trend of rising when long-term bond yields increase, the central bank said more investors were hedging themselves to insure against further falls within the US currency.
It also highlighted rising concern about financing activity moving out of banks towards less regulated market-based providers, adding that this “could amplify” any asset price correction.
The BoE said it planned to seek the advice of on options to deal with vulnerabilities in repurchase, or repo, markets, by which investors raise money against UK gilts. It said hedge fund net borrowing in UK repo markets had risen to a record £77bn in June.
Officials would soon publish a discussion paper searching for views on “potential options to assist mitigate gilt repo market vulnerabilities, including greater central clearing of gilt repo and minimum haircuts on non-centrally cleared gilt repo”, it said.
“While UK markets functioned well through the heightened period of volatility in April, this was to some extent a function of the relatively shortlived nature of the market disruption,” it said. “Vulnerabilities — though not unique to UK core markets — persist, specifically those linked to excessive leverage.”