Diddy Awaits $50M Bail Decision Ahead Of Sentencing

Despite hopes for release on bail, federal prosecutors insist the hip-hop mogul must remain behind bars as he awaits sentencing.

With latest claims that his prison term might be “substantially higher” than initially estimated, Diddy’s future and freedom hang within the balance.

In early July, Diddy was acquitted of significant racketeering conspiracy and sex trafficking charges that might have carried life sentences.

Nevertheless, he was convicted on two counts of transportation to have interaction in prostitution after arranging for girlfriends and male sex staff to travel for encounters he recorded.

Each count carries a possible sentence of as much as 10 years in prison. Initially, prosecutors suggested that sentencing guidelines indicated a four- to five-year prison term.

Nevertheless, in response to the Each day Mail, prosecutors revealed in a Manhattan federal court filing on Thursday that they now imagine the sentencing guidelines “might be substantially higher,” signaling the opportunity of a significantly longer punishment.

They argued that the danger of flight has increased and opposed Diddy’s renewed request for release on $50 million bail before his October 3 sentencing.

On the day of the decision, Diddy’s defense lawyer, Marc Agnifilo, argued his client needs to be granted immediate bail.

Nevertheless, Judge Arun Subramanian denied the request, ruling that Diddy had not met the usual of showing “by clear and convincing evidence a scarcity of danger to any person or the community.”

Still, the judge allowed Agnifilo to revisit the request. Earlier this week, the defense filed again, citing “severe conditions” at Brooklyn’s Metropolitan Detention Center, where Diddy has been held since his September arrest at a Manhattan hotel.

Agnifilo also argued that Diddy was being unfairly punished for his private lifestyle, writing that the music mogul was targeted for his participation in a “swingers’ lifestyle wherein he and his girlfriends sometimes invited male sex staff to hitch them in multiday marathon sex performances.”

Prosecutors quickly dismissed the defense’s arguments. They said the law requires the disgraced mogul to stay in jail before sentencing unless he can prove exceptional circumstances, which, of their view, he cannot.

In addition they pushed back against claims of poor jail conditions, noting that “conditions on the federal lockup had improved considerably” before his arrest.

They emphasized Diddy’s history, writing, “The defendant’s extensive history of violence — and his continued attempt to attenuate his recent violent conduct — demonstrates his dangerousness and that he just isn’t amenable to supervision.”

They concluded, “The defendant utterly fails to determine by clear and convincing evidence, as required, that he doesn’t pose a danger to the community.”

Meanwhile, Agnifilo countered by insisting his client posed no threat.

“Sean Combs won’t be violent to anyone. As we said in court, this jury gave him his life back, and he won’t squander his second likelihood at life, nor would he do anything to further jeopardize his seven children not having a father, and 4 of his children not having a parent in any respect,” he wrote.

The potential pardon was said to depend largely on the final result of the bail hearing.

Trump had earlier hinted at the opportunity of granting leniency to the hip-hop mogul, stating, “I would definitely have a look at the facts if I believe someone was mistreated, whether or not they like me or do not like me. It would not have any impact on me.”

Based on TMZ, insiders revealed that Trump is “greater than open” to pardoning Diddy, however the move hinged on Judge Arun Subramanian’s ruling on the rapper’s bail petition.

If Diddy were granted bail, Trump might need waited until sentencing before deciding on the pardon.

Nevertheless, following the denial of bail, the choice could come immediately.

Reports suggest that Trump sympathizes with Diddy’s case, believing that, like himself, the rapper was “unfairly targeted” by federal authorities.

An insider noted that the firing of lead prosecutor Maurene Comey further reinforced this attitude.

The source also claimed that the timing of a possible pardon could be politically advantageous, describing it as “perfect” for shifting public attention away from the Epstein scandal.

The notion of a pardon has been circulating since Trump first mentioned it during a discussion within the Oval Office.

Speaking about his past relationship with the rapper, Trump recalled, per Page Six, “He used to actually like me so much, but I believe after I ran for politics … that relationship busted up, from what I read. I do not know — he didn’t tell me that, but I’d read some little bit nasty statements within the paper unexpectedly.”