Australia’s online safety watchdog said Tuesday it was considering court motion against Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok and YouTube alleging they will not be doing enough to maintain Australian children younger than 16 off their platforms.
Experts say the Australian courts could determine what steps the platforms can reasonably be expected to take under the laws that took effect on Dec. 10 banning young children from holding accounts.
Julie Inman Grant, who’s Australia’s eSafety Commissioner, on Tuesday released her first compliance report since those laws took effect demanding 10 platforms remove all Australian account-holders younger than 16.While 5 million Australian accounts had been deactivated, a considerable variety of Australian children continued to retain accounts, create recent accounts and pass platforms’ age assurance systems, the report said.
Inman Grant said in an announcement her office had “significant concerns concerning the compliance” of half of those 10 platforms. Her office was gathering evidence against the five that that they had not taken “reasonable steps” to stop young children holding accounts.
Courts could order fines of as much as 49.5 million Australian dollars ($33 million) for systemic failures to comply. eSafety would choose whether to initiate court motion against any platform by midyear.
Get breaking National news
Get breaking Canada news delivered to your inbox because it happens so you will not miss a trending story.
Age-restricted platforms that aren’t under investigation are Reddit, X, Kick, Threads and Twitch.
Communications Minister Anika Wells said the five criticized platforms were deliberately not complying with Australian law.
“Social media platforms are selecting to do absolutely the bare minimum because they need these laws to fail,” Wells told reporters.
“That is the world-leading law. We’re the primary on this planet to do it. After all they don’t want these laws to work because they need that to be a chilling effect on the dozen countries which have come out since Dec. 10 to follow Australia’s step,” she added.
eSafety had identified “poor practices” akin to platforms allowing unlimited attempts for a user to pass their age assurance methods and prompting the user to attempt to pass the age assurance method even after they declared themselves underage.
Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram, told The Associated Press it was committed to complying with Australia’s social media ban. “We’ve also been clear that accurately determining age online is a challenge for the entire industry,” the statement said.
Snap Inc., the parent company of Snapchat, said it has locked 450,000 accounts in compliance with the law and continued to lock more daily.
“Snapchat stays fully committed to implementing reasonable steps under the laws and supporting its underlying goal of improving online safety for young Australians,” a Snap statement said.
TikTok declined to comment on Tuesday and Alphabet Inc., which owns YouTube and Google, didn’t immediately reply to a request for comment.
Lisa Given, an information sciences expert at RMIT University in Melbourne, said she expected the courts will determine whether platforms have taken “reasonable steps” to exclude young children.
“If a tech company has said: look, we put in age assurance, we’ve done all these steps. That’s reasonable. Though the aged assurance technologies are flawed, whose fault is that? Should they be held accountable for a bit of technology that just isn’t 100% and sure not going to be 100% foolproof any time soon?” Given said.
“That’s really the crux of it: what the courts will deem reasonable,” she added.
Reddit has filed considered one of two constitutional challenges to the social media ban within the Australian High Court. The opposite was filed by Digital Freedom Project, a Sydney-based rights group that didn’t immediately reply to a request for comment Tuesday.
Each suits claim the law is unconstitutional since it infringes on Australia’s implied freedom of political communication.
A prelimary hearing is ready for May 21 when the court will set a date for oral arguments, Reddit said Tuesday.
© 2026 The Canadian Press