Nitish Rana has been fined 25 percent of his match fee and given one demerit point for violating the IPL Code of Conduct during Delhi Capitals’ match against Chennai Super Kings at Chepauk. The penalty was imposed after he was found guilty of using inappropriate language during a heated exchange with the fourth umpire within the nineteenth over.
Rana admitted to the offence and accepted the punishment awarded by the match referee.
“Nitish Rana, batter, Delhi Capitals has been fined 25% of his match fee and has also accrued 1 demerit point for breaching Level 1 of the IPL‘s Code of Conduct for Players,” the IPL statement said.
“Rana was found to have breached article 2.3 of the IPL’s Code of Conduct, which pertains to ‘use of an audible obscenity during a match’,” it added.
Nitish Rana’s response occurred during an important stage of the match, when tensions were high as Delhi Capitals fought to remain in the competition. While no disciplinary motion has been reported against Tristan Stubbs despite his visible frustration, it was Rana who ultimately faced the penalty for his confrontation with the officials.
You’ll be able to watch the video here:
https://twitter.com/infiniteinfos/status/2043049346040730079?s=46
Why Did Nitish Rana Argue with the Umpires?
The controversy arose from a choice involving Tristan Stubbs, who requested to alter his gloves mid-over attributable to the humid conditions affecting his grip. Nevertheless, the umpires rejected the request, referring to playing conditions that don’t permit equipment changes during an over. Following the choice, Stubbs found it difficult to regain momentum and was dismissed shortly after, visibly displeased.
Subsequently, Nitish Rana, together with Delhi Capitals head coach Hemang Badani, approached the fourth umpire to query the ruling. Rana argued that similar changes had been allowed previously, however the officials remained firm of their interpretation of the regulations.
What Do the Rules State?
In accordance with IPL playing rules, batters should be prepared when the bowler is able to deliver the ball, and any unnecessary delay may result in penalties. Equipment changes usually are not allowed during an over in the event that they interrupt the flow of the sport, and such adjustments are only permitted during designated breaks to stop time-wasting.
On this instance, the umpires made their decision based on this rule, giving priority to maintaining the continuity of play quite than accommodating the request.
Get the newest cricket news here, like us on Facebook, and follow us on Twitter and Instagram for more such updates.