{"id":343440,"date":"2026-05-31T08:29:46","date_gmt":"2026-05-31T02:59:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ebiztoday.news\/?p=343440"},"modified":"2026-05-31T08:29:47","modified_gmt":"2026-05-31T02:59:47","slug":"personal-agents-light-the-fuse-as-snowflake-and-databricks-move-up-the-ai-stack","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ebiztoday.news\/index.php\/2026\/05\/31\/personal-agents-light-the-fuse-as-snowflake-and-databricks-move-up-the-ai-stack\/","title":{"rendered":"Personal agents light the fuse as Snowflake and Databricks move up the AI stack"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><\/p>\n<div>\n<p>The unreal intelligence wave is beginning to look a bit just like the pc era \u2013 with some obvious differences.<\/p>\n<p>The primary similarity is personal productivity. Individuals are taking control of their very own work with agents, open tools and repeatable skills, very like power users once did with spreadsheets, word processors, presentation graphics and PCs. The early mandate for AI got here from the highest \u2013 CEOs and boards pushing AI into the enterprise \u2013 but the primary phase of adoption is increasingly bottom up. Individuals are downloading tools, wiring them into their very own workflows and finding ways to get more refrained from waiting for a proper enterprise transformation program.<\/p>\n<p>But there may be a significant difference between this wave and the PC era. Agents don\u2019t just create documents, spreadsheets and dashboards. They&#8217;ll act. They&#8217;ll touch data, invoke tools, call applications and, over time, execute work. So if every one, department and vendor builds its own island of intelligence, enterprises will recreate the identical silo problem that has plagued software for many years \u2013 only faster, with greater operational risk. This may occasionally be a crucial step on the journey, but it surely can&#8217;t be the tip state.<\/p>\n<p>Our premise on this Breaking Evaluation is that non-public agents will light the fuse, but sustainable enterprise value will accrue to the platforms that organize business knowledge right into a true\u00a0<strong>System of Intelligence<\/strong>, or SoI. The\u00a0<strong>system of engagement<\/strong>\u00a0becomes the brand new front end \u2013 where people interact with agents and get work done. The System of Intelligence becomes the back end \u2013 the layer that organizes enterprise data, trust, context, actions and business logic so information becomes human-readable, agent-readable and eventually executable by agents.<\/p>\n<p>For this reason Snowflake Inc. and Databricks Inc. are so relevant right away. Ahead of Snowflake Summit next week and Databricks Data + AI Summit two weeks later, we consider these two corporations needs to be viewed within the context of a much larger industry shift. As we said roughly a 12 months ago, each corporations have\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/thecuberesearch.com\/279-breaking-analysis-snowflake-and-databricks-cross-the-rubicon-into-a-new-competitive-domain\/\">crossed the Rubicon<\/a>. They are not any longer just data platforms serving analytic workloads. They&#8217;re moving toward the layer where enterprise knowledge, rules, context and eventually business logic turn into the substrate for intelligent motion.<\/p>\n<p>They should not alone. Application vendors, hyperscaler cloud providers and frontier model corporations are all pursuing some version of this control point because whoever helps organizations best model the business will shape how agents reason, resolve and act. Frontier models are critical \u2013 they&#8217;re the engine of this era. But owning the model just isn&#8217;t the identical as owning the enterprise operating context. The System of Intelligence is the world the agent lives in; the model is the engine that reasons inside that world.<\/p>\n<p>This transformation will occur in two motions at the identical time, in our view. Bottom up, individuals will construct personal agents and skills that immediately improve productivity. Top down, leadership has to guide that energy into an AI-native architecture so those skills turn into governed assets connected to a shared ontology \u2013 not one other generation of disconnected tools. The job of the chief information officer, chief AI officer and data leaders just isn&#8217;t to slow the movement down. It&#8217;s to make certain the bottom-up efforts plug into an architecture that stops latest silos from forming.<\/p>\n<p>On this Breaking Evaluation, we dig into the emerging AI software stack and unpack how enterprises can move from personal productivity to organizational productivity. We\u2019ll have a look at how Snowflake and Databricks are pushing beyond their existing data platform swim lanes, how their moves compare with application vendors and model makers, and why the following decade of enterprise AI can be shaped by the battle to prepare business knowledge, rules, actions and feedback right into a shared System of Intelligence.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-embed is-type-video is-provider-youtube wp-block-embed-youtube wp-embed-aspect-16-9 wp-has-aspect-ratio\">\n<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" title=\"316 | Breaking Analysis | Personal Agents Light the Fuse In the Age of Data Intelligence\" width=\"640\" height=\"360\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/7ojowlWTCHE?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share\" referrerpolicy=\"strict-origin-when-cross-origin\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/p>\n<\/figure>\n<h3 id=\"h-the-emerging-ai-software-stack\" class=\"wp-block-heading\">The emerging AI software stack<\/h3>\n<p>The slide below lays out the emerging AI software stack and offers us a solution to describe where the industry is headed. The model builds on concepts from Geoffrey Moore and shows five major pieces: the system of engagement on the left, the system of agency on top, the system of intelligence in the center, and the information platforms and systems of record underneath. The important thing idea is that the brand new stack doesn\u2019t replace all prior enterprise systems in a single move. It reorganizes them around intelligence, context and motion.<\/p>\n<p>Start with the purple box on the left: the\u00a0<strong>system of engagement<\/strong>. This just isn&#8217;t engagement within the social media sense. It&#8217;s the brand new front end \u2013 the place where humans and agents interact with data, decisions and actions. The precise comparison is Windows, the browser or the smartphone. Each of those front ends forced a brand new back end. Windows ultimately drove client-server computing. The browser drove scalable web backends. Mobile and web drove the cloud. Personal agents and intelligent interfaces at the moment are creating the identical type of pressure. To make the brand new front end useful, enterprises need a brand new backend that may organize knowledge, rules, context and business state in a way humans and agents can use.<\/p>\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-full\"><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<p>That back end is the\u00a0<strong>system of intelligence<\/strong>\u00a0\u2013 the green layer in the course of the slide above. That is where the exertions sits. Enterprises have spent many years constructing islands of operational data and analytic data. Humans bridge those islands today through departments, functional teams, matrix organizations, meetings and tribal knowledge. Agents need something more explicit. They need a harmonized model of the business so that they can understand state, apply rules, reason over context and take motion with confidence. Which means business logic has to turn into an asset in the identical way data became an asset over the past several many years.<\/p>\n<p>The layer on top is the\u00a0<strong>system of agency<\/strong>. That&#8217;s where agents perceive, reason, resolve, act and learn. But those agents are only as useful because the state they&#8217;ll see and the actions they&#8217;re allowed to take. They understand the business through the system of intelligence and operationalize decisions through it. That\u2019s why the system of intelligence is the high-value layer on this stack. It&#8217;s the world the agent lives in.<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Mapping products to the AI stack<\/h3>\n<p>The prior slide gave us the conceptual model. This one below starts putting company names into the architecture, which makes the industry battle lines much easier to see. The purpose just isn&#8217;t to pretend these boxes are fixed or that any vendor matches neatly in just one place. The purpose is to point out where the pressure is constructing. Snowflake and Databricks began as data platforms, but they\u2019re not staying in the underside layer. They\u2019re moving up into governance with catalogs, into systems of engagement with\u00a0<strong>Snowflake Intelligence<\/strong>\u00a0and\u00a0<strong>Databricks Genie<\/strong>, and ultimately toward the system of intelligence. That\u2019s the Rubicon they\u2019ve crossed.<\/p>\n<p>Deal with the diagram below \u2013 on the far left \u2013 with the system of engagement. That is where users interact with agents and data. The model makers are pushing hard here. ChatGPT is moving toward Codex. Claude is evolving toward Cowork. When an agent acts in your behalf, it doesn\u2019t just produce text \u2013 it emits code, calls tools, manipulates applications and accesses data. In other words, the chat interface is being rebuilt around a coding-agent harness. That\u2019s why Codex and Cowork belong on this engagement layer. They have gotten the brand new interface for work. For this reason Elon Musk\u2019s SpaceX is buying Cursor.<\/p>\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-full\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-322285\" src=\"https:\/\/thecuberesearch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/SLIDE-3.jpg\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 960px) 100vw, 960px\" srcset=\"https:\/\/thecuberesearch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/SLIDE-3.jpg 960w, https:\/\/thecuberesearch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/SLIDE-3-300x169.jpg 300w, https:\/\/thecuberesearch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/SLIDE-3-768x432.jpg 768w\" alt=\"\" width=\"960\" height=\"540\"\/><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<p>However the model makers have a structural gap. They&#8217;ve powerful models and increasingly capable agent harnesses, but they don\u2019t naturally have the structured enterprise back end. They&#8217;ll generate code, search the net and reason over prompts, but when the goal is to go looking enterprise knowledge, query governed business data and act inside a company, that enterprise context must be organized in a brand new way. That\u2019s where the information platform vendors, application vendors and ontology players are available in.<\/p>\n<p>Snowflake Intelligence and Databricks Genie are early examples of this latest front end for enterprise data. They let users seek advice from data in natural language, however the vital part isn\u2019t just the interface. It\u2019s what sits underneath. Snowflake Horizon and Databricks Unity Catalog are attempts to prepare governance metadata and definitions so the system knows what the information means, who can access it and the way it needs to be used. That\u2019s still not a full system of intelligence, but it surely is a start line.<\/p>\n<p>The green layer \u2013 the system of intelligence \u2013 is where the larger race is taking shape. That is where vendors try to prepare enterprise data, rules, process context and business meaning into something agents can use.\u00a0<strong>Glean Technologies Inc.\u00a0<\/strong>does this around a private graph of individuals, documents and interactions.\u00a0<strong>Microsoft Corp.\u00a0<\/strong>has Graph, now expressed through Work IQ and Copilot 365, with Fabric IQ moving toward an ontology layer.\u00a0<strong>Palantir Technologies Inc.\u00a0<\/strong>is more mature here with its ontology.\u00a0<strong>RelationalAI Inc., Celonis SE, Salesforce Inc.\u2019s<\/strong>\u00a0Data Cloud,\u00a0<strong>SAP SE<\/strong>\u2018s Business Data Cloud and others are all attempting to own some portion of this enterprise context.<\/p>\n<p>The important thing distinction is catalog versus intelligence. A catalog gives you definitions. It tells you what a metric means, where data lives, who owns it and what policy applies. That\u2019s crucial, but it surely\u2019s not enough. A system of intelligence goes further. It begins to model the business process logic itself \u2013 not only the nouns, however the verbs. When business rules, relationships and actions turn into live, governed and eventually executable, the enterprise moves from metadata to intelligence.<\/p>\n<p>That\u2019s why the highest layer \u2013 the system of agency \u2013 gets a lot attention but is dependent upon what happens below it. Microsoft Agent 365, Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform, Amazon Bedrock AgentCore and others are going after the control and orchestration layer for agents. But agents can only act safely and usefully in the event that they understand the state of the business through the system of intelligence. The exertions isn\u2019t just launching agents. It\u2019s giving those agents a coherent world to operate in.<\/p>\n<p>Our view is that this taxonomy explains the following phase of competition. The big language model makers will attempt to bundle model, harness, interface and memory. The applying vendors will attempt to defend their domains. The info platform vendors will move up from storage and analytics into governance, context and intelligence. And the winners can be the platforms that help enterprises model the business with enough richness that humans and agents can ask higher questions, improve answers and take safer actions.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"h-unpacking-the-system-of-intelligence\" class=\"wp-block-heading\">Unpacking the system of intelligence<\/h3>\n<p>The following slide below moves from the AI stack taxonomy to the long-term architecture we consider enterprises are attempting to construct \u2013 a real-time digital representation of the business, or an enterprise digital twin. That is the North Star. It brings together the reliability of deterministic software \u2013 systems of record, BI systems, transaction systems, governed data \u2013 with the creativity and generative power of probabilistic systems similar to LLMs. The purpose just isn&#8217;t to interchange one with the opposite. The purpose is to make them work together so agents can coordinate work, assist with judgment and eventually act with increasing confidence.<\/p>\n<p>The explanation that is so vital in our view is that an enormous portion of enterprise work today still is dependent upon human judgment. People make exceptions, adjudicate edge cases, apply tribal knowledge, reconcile conflicting signals and choose what to do when the foundations aren\u2019t clear. Initially, AI can be strongest within the coordination work \u2013 routing, summarizing, reconciling, searching, matching and organizing. Over time, more judgment-oriented work will get incorporated into this digital twin because the system learns from experts and captures the evidence behind decisions. But we don&#8217;t consider that is here today. It will take years to mature since the enterprise has to model not only data, but rules, context, actions and reasoning.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-322286\" src=\"https:\/\/thecuberesearch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/slide-4.jpg\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 960px) 100vw, 960px\" srcset=\"https:\/\/thecuberesearch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/slide-4.jpg 960w, https:\/\/thecuberesearch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/slide-4-300x169.jpg 300w, https:\/\/thecuberesearch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/slide-4-768x432.jpg 768w\" alt=\"\" width=\"960\" height=\"540\"\/><\/figure>\n<p>The slide above unpacks the System of Intelligence into five layers. The underside two layers form the deterministic digital twin \u2013 the inspiration.<strong>\u00a0Layer 1 is the mapping layer<\/strong>, essentially the \u201cRosetta Stone\u201d for the enterprise. Large corporations have lots of or hundreds of operational applications and islands of analytic data. When the business says \u201ccustomer,\u201d \u201corder,\u201d \u201caccount,\u201d or \u201casset,\u201d the system has to map that idea across all the several applications and attributes. Without that, you don\u2019t actually have a common object model.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Layer 2 is the foundations layer<\/strong>. Once the enterprise has common objects, it has to model how those objects interact and the way the business must run. These are the deterministic rules that today are embalmed and entombed inside operational applications \u2014 rules similar to whether a customer can receive credit, whether an order can ship or whether a workflow is allowed to proceed. Our view is these rules need to turn into harmonized assets, just as data became an asset many years ago.<\/p>\n<p>The upper three layers form the cognitive digital twin \u2013 the reasoning layer.\u00a0<strong>Layer 3 is institutional memory<\/strong>. That is where the system starts capturing the dark matter of the enterprise \u2013 what happened before, what experts considered, what actions were taken, what evidence supported those actions and what conditions shaped the choice. This just isn&#8217;t only a document repository. It&#8217;s a searchable record of expert reasoning traces.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Layer 4 is decision guidance<\/strong>. That is where institutional memory is synthesized into advice. When a human or agent is about to make a choice, the System of Intelligence can mix the deterministic state of the business with prior expert reasoning and supply a advice. Under these conditions, given what happened before and given the present state of the business, what should we do next? That&#8217;s where AI begins to maneuver from coordination into judgment support.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Layer 5 is learning and feedback<\/strong>, and we consider it&#8217;s one in every of the least understood but most significant layers. That is the behavioral exhaust of agents. It captures how agents reason, what they do, what evidence they use, once they fail, when humans intervene and the way outcomes change because of this. This becomes the brand new big data. Within the 2010s, enterprises collected clickstream data to learn the way people interacted with web sites. Within the agentic era, enterprises will collect agent reasoning and motion traces to learn the way agents interact with business processes. The quantity of this data could possibly be orders of magnitude larger than traditional observability data from cloud-native applications.<\/p>\n<p>The takeaway is that the System of Intelligence just isn&#8217;t a single product layer that magically appears in 2026. It&#8217;s a multi-layer architecture that matures over time. Some pieces exist already. Catalogs, governance metadata, observability tools, process mining, knowledge graphs and agent frameworks all play a job. But the tip state is more ambitious and can form as a deterministic and cognitive digital twin that understands the state of the business, captures the foundations and the exceptions, supports human judgment and teaches agents to enhance.<\/p>\n<p>That&#8217;s the reason the arc of AI initiatives will form over longer periods of time for established firms. CEOs similar to Michael Dell, JPMorgan Chase &#038; Co.\u2019s Jamie Dimon, Amazon.com Inc.\u2019s Andy Jassy, Google LLC\u2019s Sundar Pichai and others have pushed AI top-down. At the identical time, individuals are already constructing agents with tools similar to NemoClaw, Hermes Agent and other open-source frameworks. The underside-up movement is real. The challenge is ensuring those personal agents and skills eventually plug into this type of architecture quite than creating one other generation of disconnected silos.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"h-reality-islands-of-intelligence-will-come-first\" class=\"wp-block-heading\">Reality: Islands of intelligence will come first<\/h3>\n<p>Though the North Star is an enterprise digital twin, the actual world won\u2019t get there in a single clean, unified step. The following slide below shows the more practical and messy path where systems of intelligence will emerge first around islands of information. Snowflake will attempt to harmonize and enrich the information it controls. Databricks will do the identical around its lakehouse and Unity-centric ecosystem. Salesforce Data Cloud, SAP Business Data Cloud, Microsoft Fabric IQ and others will create domain-specific intelligence layers across the business data they understand best.<\/p>\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-full\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-322287\" src=\"https:\/\/thecuberesearch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/slide-5.jpg\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 960px) 100vw, 960px\" srcset=\"https:\/\/thecuberesearch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/slide-5.jpg 960w, https:\/\/thecuberesearch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/slide-5-300x169.jpg 300w, https:\/\/thecuberesearch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/slide-5-768x432.jpg 768w\" alt=\"\" width=\"960\" height=\"540\"\/><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<p>This just isn&#8217;t necessarily a nasty thing. Actually, it will be the only pragmatic way the market moves forward. Customers have already got fragmented estates, and no enterprise goes to attend for an ideal intergalactic digital twin before deploying agents. Salesforce can organize customer-related data. SAP can organize back-office and operational data. Snowflake and Databricks can organize analytic and unstructured data tied to their platforms. These domain-specific layers turn into early systems of intelligence \u2013 not the ultimate enterprise-wide system, but useful overlays that permit customers ask higher questions and operationalize actions in bounded areas of the business.<\/p>\n<p>The vital nuance is that these overlays don\u2019t necessarily extract and replace the client\u2019s analytic estate. In lots of cases, they sit above it, synchronize with it, enrich it or cache parts of it in order that the seller can create a more useful model for its domain. Salesforce Data Cloud, for instance, just isn&#8217;t attempting to turn into your complete enterprise data estate. It&#8217;s attempting to make customer-related data more usable for analytics and agentic actions. SAP Business Data Cloud has an identical ambition for operational and business process data. Which means the early market can be filled with partial digital twins \u2013 each useful, each incomplete.<\/p>\n<p>This creates a core strategic tension. Software-as-a-service vendors are fighting for relevance in an agentic world. They need to bring their deterministic business logic along with probabilistic AI, partner with the LLM vendors and keep their installed bases inside their very own control plane. They don\u2019t need to turn into passive feeds into Snowflake, Databricks, Palantir or another horizontal system of intelligence. In the event that they turn into just one other data source, their differentiation and pricing power decline.<\/p>\n<p>That\u2019s why each vendor wants its data layer to be visible to its agents as first-class residents in high-value workflows. If a vendor owns the operational platform where agents act, it will possibly see the work product, influence the end result and potentially price closer to a unit of labor or business end result. If it only feeds data into another person\u2019s intelligence layer, it gets pushed toward consumption pricing. That could be a much less attractive economic position.<\/p>\n<p>Our view is that the following phase will seem like a kids\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.google.com\/imgres?q=stacking%20game%20one%20hand%20over%20the%20other&#038;imgurl=https%3A%2F%2Fblogger.googleusercontent.com%2Fimg%2Fb%2FR29vZ2xl%2FAVvXsEhS0MCl6CKr1purruyLIeVTQ8aFyZonlLLADDD7q8BR0N3qfWWZN5Eqfmzhh_fb0NGDUBoGydOCrE2bAMFYpaULUKpIP_mdkO2_jjLIHJbZitQHuMLlc8oUug3o8mXMzcN3fQP3_MfdW2M%2Fs1600%2Fhand-games-for-kids-2.jpg&#038;imgrefurl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.andnextcomesl.com%2F2016%2F03%2Fhand-games-for-fidgety-kids.html&#038;docid=udtRv8E_JQkNUM&#038;tbnid=OWAiUuF5JYbezM&#038;vet=12ahUKEwjLvoO_1uGUAxUFKFkFHW27HgkQnPAOegQIIxAB..i&#038;w=600&#038;h=906&#038;hcb=2&#038;ved=2ahUKEwjLvoO_1uGUAxUFKFkFHW27HgkQnPAOegQIIxAB\">stacking game<\/a>. Each vendor will attempt to put its intelligence layer above the others, make its domain the place where agents operate and try and co-opt the workflow. The client problem is that this may recreate the identical fragmented software landscape we have already got \u2013 only now with islands of intelligence and agents acting inside each. That will help personal productivity and domain-specific automation, but it&#8217;s going to not deliver the total digital-twin vision.<\/p>\n<p>The trail forward is to make use of these islands pragmatically without mistaking them for the destination. Customers should take the productivity gains where they can be found, but they also needs to force vendors toward interoperability, shared governance, common identity, consistent semantics and a broader enterprise ontology. Unfortunately, the history of the tech industry suggests it is a long shot.<\/p>\n<p>Regardless, the best value will accrue to the platforms that may model how the business actually works across domains. The scope and fidelity of that model will determine where agents gravitate, what work they&#8217;ll do and the way much of the business they&#8217;ll safely help run.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"h-how-the-soi-matures-from-snapshots-to-process-definitions-as-data\" class=\"wp-block-heading\">How the SoI matures: From snapshots to process definitions as data<\/h3>\n<p>This graphic below starts to unpack how the foundational layers of the System of Intelligence mature over time. The purpose just isn&#8217;t that enterprises jump from today\u2019s data platforms on to a full enterprise digital twin. They won\u2019t. The sensible path is one which moves through stages, and every stage increases the scope and fidelity of the business model. This is essential since the sophistication of the information model determines the sophistication of the analytics, and the sophistication of the analytics determines how much motion humans and agents can take with confidence.<\/p>\n<p>That is the important thing idea behind the next chart. If the information model is shallow, the system can mostly let you know what happened. If the model has harmonized entities and real-time events, the system can begin to diagnose and predict. If the model captures relationships, motion spaces, real-time state and process logic, then the system starts moving from analytics into operations. That\u2019s the trail from business intelligence to enterprise intelligence.<\/p>\n<p>Snowflake\u2019s\u00a0recent momentum\u00a0is a superb early example of how that is taking shape. As natural language interfaces make data easier to question, more people query more data. And people queries turn into more compute-intensive because agents don\u2019t just run static dashboards. They ask follow-up questions, gather context and behave more like a deep research workflow than a precompiled report. That may drive consumption and monetization, which is sweet for platforms similar to Snowflake, but it surely also creates a future cost query for purchasers. Someone\u2019s budget goes to feel the impact when agentic query becomes mainstream.<\/p>\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-full\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-322289\" src=\"https:\/\/thecuberesearch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/SLIDE-6.jpg\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 960px) 100vw, 960px\" srcset=\"https:\/\/thecuberesearch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/SLIDE-6.jpg 960w, https:\/\/thecuberesearch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/SLIDE-6-300x169.jpg 300w, https:\/\/thecuberesearch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/SLIDE-6-768x432.jpg 768w\" alt=\"\" width=\"960\" height=\"540\"\/><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<p>The slide lays out nine levels of maturity as follows:<\/p>\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Level 1: Siloed aggregate snapshots<\/strong>\u00a0\u2013 Departmental reports, metrics and dimensions, with no shared entity identifiers or historical memory. That is the classic business intelligence world.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Level 2: Canonical entity resolution<\/strong>\u00a0\u2013 The enterprise starts to determine one reference for key entities similar to customer, account, product or order.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Level 3: Temporal event context<\/strong>\u00a0\u2013 Real-time updates begin flowing into tables, so every event is preserved with its surrounding context.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Level 4: Behavioral abstractions<\/strong>\u00a0\u2013 Machine learning identifies recurring patterns, similar to high-value shoppers, fraud risk, churn signals or concentrated issuer relationships.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Level 5: Probabilistic predictions as data<\/strong>\u00a0\u2013 Predictions themselves turn into data objects, with confidence intervals and metadata attached.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Level 6: Enterprise knowledge graph<\/strong>\u00a0\u2013 The model becomes a proper representation of relationships across the business.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Level 7: Semantic motion specifications<\/strong>\u00a0\u2013 The model begins representing what could be done, not only what exists.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Level 8: Real-time operational state<\/strong>\u00a0\u2013 The graph becomes the live source of truth for the business, replacing the role of older operational databases in some scenarios.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Level 9: Process definitions as data<\/strong>\u00a0\u2013 Business workflows, rules and coordination patterns turn into data quite than hard-coded application logic.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>The lower levels are quite familiar. Most enterprises have been working on versions of levels one through three for years. They&#8217;ve dashboards, reporting cubes, metrics, catalogs, governance metadata and, increasingly, event streams that update data in real time. That is where we expect Snowflake and Databricks to point out more progress \u2013 especially around natural language query, catalogs, governance and real-time data updates.<\/p>\n<p>The center levels are where the model becomes more expressive. At level 4, the system starts to acknowledge behavior. At level five, it turns probabilities into usable business signals. At level six, the enterprise starts to represent business relationships as wealthy objects, not only rows and columns. A sale is not any longer only a transaction. It becomes an online of related entities \u2013 for instance customer, order, SKU, promotion, inventory, success center, carrier, payment, risk and timing. That is where graph pondering becomes vital, and why players similar to Neo4j, Salesforce Data Cloud and SAP Business Data Cloud show up around these middle layers, often in domain-specific ways.<\/p>\n<p>Level seven is where the model starts to turn into way more interesting. The sale is not any longer only a record of what happened. It becomes a set of possible actions \u2013 for instance apply a promotion, reserve inventory, authorize payment, split the shipment, notify the client, escalate to an agent or pause the transaction. Those actions should not just application programming interfaces calls buried in application code. They turn into modeled and governed. The system knows what could be done, under what preconditions and with what expected effects. For this reason Palantir is shown higher within the stack. Its ontology has pushed further into modeling actions and operational decisions, though often with heavy customer-specific work.<\/p>\n<p>Level eight is the live operational state. The system knows what is going on now, not only what happened last night. It knows the client\u2019s cart, the present inventory for the product, the payment authorization, the success center\u2019s load and the carrier pickup window. \u201cReserved\u201d means reserved now, not a snapshot from yesterday. That is where the System of Intelligence starts to behave more just like the operational truth layer.<\/p>\n<p>Level nine is probably the most ambitious state. Process logic becomes data. Changing how the business runs becomes an information update quite than a code deploy. The system can reason about and improve the method itself. This remains to be well into the long run for many enterprises, but it surely defines the direction of AI\u2019s enterprise promise. It&#8217;s why we show RelationalAI near the highest of the model. The ambition is to represent business logic, rules, relationships and processes in a way that could be queried, reasoned over and ultimately executed.<\/p>\n<p>The vital point for purchasers is that these levels should not just abstract maturity stages. They determine what questions could be asked, what answers could be trusted and what actions agents can safely take. A level one system can let you know what happened. A level three system can update the reply in real time. A level six system can explain relationships. A level seven or eight system can recommend and coordinate actions. A level nine system starts to make the enterprise itself programmable.<\/p>\n<p>Our view is that that is the architecture behind the following decade of enterprise AI. The richness of the information model determines the richness of the intelligence. And the richer the intelligence, the more useful the agents turn into. The platforms that help customers move up this maturity curve \u2013 without creating yet one more set of silos \u2013 can be those that matter most.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"h-data-foundation-maturity-from-descriptive-analytics-to-autonomous-planning\" class=\"wp-block-heading\">Data foundation maturity: From descriptive analytics to autonomous planning<\/h3>\n<p>This section takes the nine-level maturity model and shows why the information foundation determines the analytic ceiling of the enterprise. Said one other way, the richer the model of the business, the richer the questions the system can answer. And the richer the answers, the more confidence humans and agents can have in taking motion.<\/p>\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-full\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-322290\" src=\"https:\/\/thecuberesearch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/SLIDE-7.jpg\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 960px) 100vw, 960px\" srcset=\"https:\/\/thecuberesearch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/SLIDE-7.jpg 960w, https:\/\/thecuberesearch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/SLIDE-7-300x169.jpg 300w, https:\/\/thecuberesearch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/SLIDE-7-768x432.jpg 768w\" alt=\"\" width=\"960\" height=\"540\"\/><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<p>At the underside of the stack above,\u00a0<strong>levels one and two<\/strong>\u00a0are again, familiar territory. That is the world of departmental snapshots, metrics, dimensions and entity resolution. A business can ask basic questions similar to: Do gold-tier customers who bought in the course of the spring promotion spend more per order than bronze customers? That\u2019s useful, but it surely\u2019s still immature. The person customer is hidden inside an aggregate dimension. You&#8217;ll be able to see that something happened, however the system can\u2019t really explain why. There\u2019s no sequence, no causality and due to this fact no grounded advice.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Levels three and 4<\/strong>\u00a0start moving the enterprise from descriptive analytics toward\u00a0<strong>diagnosis and early prediction<\/strong>. Events are preserved in temporal order, and behavioral labels get layered on top. Now the system can decompose an end result into a series of events. As a substitute of merely saying a customer purchased a tent, the system can ask: Why did Maria\u2019s tent purchase convert so quickly? At level 4, the pattern gets a reputation. Maria is a deal-driven replenisher. She responded to a promotion, replenished in a category and hurried through the funnel. That\u2019s a unique class of analytics since the system is beginning to interpret behavior, not only count transactions.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Levels five and 6<\/strong>\u00a0move into\u00a0<strong>prescriptive and optimization<\/strong>\u00a0territory. Now the system doesn\u2019t just describe Maria\u2019s behavior, it carries repeatedly updated predictions about her and the entities round her. Maria has a 68% probability of repurchasing on this category inside 30 days. She has a 19% churn risk driven by two late deliveries. At level six, those relationships turn into traversable through a graph. The client, SKU, promotion, success center, delivery history, carrier, order and repair experience are connected objects. The query becomes sharper, more individual and more actionable.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Levels seven through nine<\/strong>\u00a0are where the model begins to cross\u00a0<strong>from analytics into operations<\/strong>. At level seven, the business\u2019s possibility space becomes legible. The system doesn\u2019t just know what happened; it knows what could be done. It understands actions with preconditions and effects. For instance, across every order currently mid-checkout in the course of the spring sale, which orders are eligible for split shipment and what would that do to delivery time?<\/p>\n<p><strong>Level eight makes the business\u2019s present state knowable<\/strong>. That is the moment when the model is not any longer a snapshot. It may possibly answer what&#8217;s true right away across the business how much tent inventory stays, what number of carts contain one, which success centers are at capability, and where carrier delays are emerging. At level nine, the business\u2019s operating logic becomes inspectable. The method itself becomes data. The system can ask things similar to what&#8217;s the defined path an order takes from cart to settlement, what rules govern each transition, and where do orders actually stall versus where the business assumed they might?<\/p>\n<p>The sequence is as follows:<\/p>\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Levels one and two\u00a0<strong>count the sale<\/strong>;<\/li>\n<li>Levels three and 4\u00a0<strong>explain the sale;<\/strong><\/li>\n<li>Levels five and 6\u00a0<strong>prescribe across the sale<\/strong>;<\/li>\n<li>Levels seven through nine act on and<strong>\u00a0improve the sale<\/strong>.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Our view is that this is the sensible roadmap for moving from business intelligence to enterprise intelligence. It also explains why the information platform battle is moving up the stack. The worth just isn&#8217;t just storing more data or running faster SQL. The worth is increasing the representational sophistication of the business model so the enterprise can ask higher questions, get more confident answers and eventually allow agents to take bounded motion.<\/p>\n<p>That\u2019s the important thing point for buyers heading into Snowflake Summit and Databricks Data + AI Summit. Natural language query and agentic analytics will make data more accessible and can likely drive more consumption. However the strategic query just isn&#8217;t only \u201cCan I seek advice from my data?\u201d The query can also be \u201cHow far up this maturity curve can my platform take me?\u201d Since the answer determines whether AI stays descriptive and advisory, or becomes prescriptive, operational and eventually self-improving.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"h-range-of-actions-data-maturity-gates-agent-autonomy\" class=\"wp-block-heading\">Range of actions: Data maturity gates agent autonomy<\/h3>\n<p>The prior section focused on the maturity of the analytic data foundation \u2013 how the enterprise moves from siloed metrics and static snapshots toward richer models that may diagnose, predict, prescribe and eventually simulate. The next slide takes the following step and asks \u201cWhat can agents actually do at each level of maturity?\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The reply is that agent motion is gated by the sophistication of the information model and the analytics built on top of it. Dropping ChatGPT, Claude or any frontier model into the enterprise is simply step one. Models can reason, however the enterprise has to offer them a structured representation of the business. The richer that representation, the more sophisticated the analytics can turn into. And the more sophisticated the analytics, the more motion the agent can safely take.<\/p>\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-full\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-322291\" src=\"https:\/\/thecuberesearch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/SLIDE-8-2.jpg\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 960px) 100vw, 960px\" srcset=\"https:\/\/thecuberesearch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/SLIDE-8-2.jpg 960w, https:\/\/thecuberesearch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/SLIDE-8-2-300x169.jpg 300w, https:\/\/thecuberesearch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/SLIDE-8-2-768x432.jpg 768w\" alt=\"\" width=\"960\" height=\"540\"\/><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<p>At\u00a0<strong>levels 1 and a pair of<\/strong>, there is basically no real agent motion. That is the \u201cseek advice from your data\u201d phase that vendors began showing last 12 months. Agents can read data, use metrics and dimensions, answer questions in natural language and generate dashboards or conversational responses. That is where capabilities similar to Snowflake Intelligence and Databricks Genie begin. They make data more accessible, but humans still interpret the output and choose what to do. The system can assist find information, but it surely just isn&#8217;t yet operating the business.<\/p>\n<p>There&#8217;s a crucial implication here for the BI layer. Once the system of engagement can generate the user interface based on governed metrics and dimensions, the dashboard becomes less handcrafted and more dynamic. If a platform owns the metric and dimension definitions, it will possibly generate the dashboard on demand. That&#8217;s the reason control of the semantic layer matters a lot. The BI tool becomes less vital if the system of engagement can create the interface directly from trusted business definitions. That is one reason Microsoft\u2019s move to constrain Databricks\u2019 Power BI access is notable. The fight just isn&#8217;t just over dashboards \u2013 it&#8217;s over who controls the definitions that generate the business view.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Levels 3 and 4<\/strong>\u00a0move into tentative\u00a0<strong>segment-level recommendations<\/strong>. That is where the system starts seeing behavioral signals and might recommend actions for cohorts. A Salesforce Data Cloud-style example might say things like similar customers showing Maria\u2019s hesitation pattern convert at a much higher rate when sent a reduction inside 48 hours. That could be a useful advice, but it surely remains to be heuristic. A marketer still decides whether to act. An agent may execute the campaign, but a human initiates or approves the choice.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Levels 5 and 6<\/strong>\u00a0turn into more precise and\u00a0<strong>individualized<\/strong>. The system is not any longer making broad cohort suggestions. It may possibly generate quantified recommendations for a selected entity, customer, account, order or asset. For instance: Issue Maria free shipping, which is predicted to scale back her churn risk from 19% to 7%. That&#8217;s materially different from \u201crun a campaign for this segment.\u201d The advice is tied to a selected customer, specific predicted end result and specific motion. Humans are still within the loop, however the system is starting to offer decision-grade guidance.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Levels 7 through 9<\/strong>\u00a0are where the motion model changes. At level 7,\u00a0<strong>actions themselves are modeled<\/strong>. The agent can reason about an motion space quite than merely invoking a hard-coded API. It may possibly understand that the goal is to retain Maria at an appropriate margin, resolve her delivery grievance after which issue a retention offer. Autonomous execution begins here, but only inside governance bounds.<\/p>\n<p>At\u00a0<strong>level 8,<\/strong>\u00a0the agent acts against\u00a0<strong>live business state<\/strong>. If the system sees mid-flow that the tent Maria wanted has just gone out of stock, it will possibly substitute an alternate, recommend a unique offer or stop the motion before triggering something the corporate cannot fulfill. Human oversight moves from approving every step to handling exceptions.<\/p>\n<p>At\u00a0<strong>level 9<\/strong>, the method itself becomes data. The agent just isn&#8217;t just executing the method; it&#8217;s\u00a0<strong>learning\u00a0<\/strong>how the method should improve. It might discover that resolving complaints before issuing promotions retains deal-driven buyers like Maria more effectively. The system then has the premise to recommend or eventually adjust the method.<\/p>\n<p>Here\u2019s the flow:<\/p>\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Levels 1-2: Humans interpret static reports.<\/li>\n<li>Levels 3-4: Systems recommend broad segment actions.<\/li>\n<li>Levels 5-6: Systems recommend quantified individual actions.<\/li>\n<li>Levels 7-9: Agents discover, plan, execute and improve inside governance bounds.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>This can also be where the backup and recovery discussion becomes more strategic. In a mature agentic system, the enterprise just isn&#8217;t only backing up data. It&#8217;s capturing the state of the business \u2013 what the agent knew, what it reasoned, what motion it took, which tools it invoked and why the choice was made. That&#8217;s the inspiration for trust, recovery and learning. If the agent does something mistaken, the organization needs to know not only what happened, however the logic that drove the motion.<\/p>\n<p>The takeaway is that agent autonomy just isn&#8217;t a switch. It&#8217;s a maturity curve. The richer the information foundation, the more sophisticated the analytics. The more sophisticated the analytics, the more range of motion agents can safely take. Enterprises mustn&#8217;t confuse \u201cseek advice from your data\u201d with autonomous operation. They&#8217;re related, but they sit at very different levels of maturity.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"h-critical-emerging-layers-where-agents-learn-prove-and-improve\" class=\"wp-block-heading\">Critical emerging layers: Where agents learn, prove and improve<\/h3>\n<p>This final slide below zooms in on layers\u00a0<strong>three, 4 and five<\/strong>\u00a0<strong>of the System of Intelligence<\/strong>\u00a0because these are the layers that may determine whether enterprises merely deploy agents \u2013 or actually construct learning organizations around them. The underside deterministic layers are crucial because they map the business and encode the foundations. However the top layers are where the system begins to capture judgment, institutional memory and the reasoning exhaust required to enhance agents over time.<\/p>\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-full\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-322292\" src=\"https:\/\/thecuberesearch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/SLIDE-9-2.jpg\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 960px) 100vw, 960px\" srcset=\"https:\/\/thecuberesearch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/SLIDE-9-2.jpg 960w, https:\/\/thecuberesearch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/SLIDE-9-2-300x169.jpg 300w, https:\/\/thecuberesearch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/SLIDE-9-2-768x432.jpg 768w\" alt=\"\" width=\"960\" height=\"540\"\/><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<p>An important layer here is\u00a0<strong>Layer 5 \u2013 learning and feedback<\/strong>. We consider this becomes the brand new source of truth for agent reasoning. Within the database world, the write-ahead log was the actual source of truth since it recorded what happened before the tables were updated. Within the agentic world, the equivalent source of truth is the observability substrate that captures how agents reasoned, what context they pulled in, what tool calls they made, what the tools returned, how subagents interacted and what state of the business existed when a choice was made.<\/p>\n<p>This can be a much greater data problem than traditional cloud observability. Clickstreams drove the big-data movement because they created orders of magnitude more data than traditional analytic systems were built to handle. Agent exhaust could create one other step-function increase \u2013 potentially 1,000 to 100,000 times more data than what observability platforms captured for cloud-native applications. And this just isn&#8217;t just after-the-fact diagnosis. It becomes the system that teaches agents, scores their reasoning, gates their release and monitors them in production.<\/p>\n<p>That&#8217;s the reason observability, evals, CI\/CD and agent reliability engineering collapse into one substrate. Evals rating how an agent reasoned. Those scores turn into gates within the deployment process. The identical traces are used to enhance the following version of the agent. And in production, reliability agents can use that very same substrate to intervene when one other agent starts to drift, fail or violate policy. For this reason Snowflake bought\u00a0<strong>Observe<\/strong>, why Databricks is extending\u00a0<strong>MLflow\u00a0<\/strong>toward agent observability, why\u00a0<strong>Datadog Inc.\u00a0<\/strong>is well positioned around this layer and why newer players similar to\u00a0<strong>Braintrust Data Inc.\u00a0<\/strong>could also be more useful than people realize. The market should still consider this as monitoring. We predict it&#8217;s becoming the educational system for agentic software.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Layer 3\u00a0<\/strong>is the opposite crucial piece. That is the\u00a0<strong>context graph<\/strong>\u00a0\u2013 but not within the shallow \u201cthrow documents into RAG\u201d sense. We consider classic retrieval-augmented generation is insufficient since it fails to capture much of the structure embedded in documents, conversations, policies, contracts and expert communications. The enterprise has to maneuver from unstructured to structured knowledge. Which means extracting, representing and serving the 90% of corporate knowledge that lives outside traditional databases.<\/p>\n<p>This can be a latest form of information engineering. The old data engineering model took operational data and transformed it into analytic data through pipelines. The brand new model takes knowledge assets \u2013 documents, Slack threads, emails, contracts, policies, call notes, process documents \u2013 and extracts structure from them so agents can reason over them.\u00a0<strong>Pinecone Systems Inc.<\/strong>\u2018s move beyond easy vector embeddings toward\u00a0<strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.pinecone.io\/product\/nexus\/\">Nexus\u00a0<\/a><\/strong>is a superb example of this direction. The purpose just isn&#8217;t \u201cvector search is enough.\u201d The purpose is that enterprise knowledge has to turn into structured enough to be a part of the System of Intelligence.<\/p>\n<p>The second a part of Layer 3 is<strong>\u00a0expert teaching<\/strong>. That is where domain experts show the system the right way to reason through a tough decision. They document what good reasoning looks like, what evidence matters, what tradeoffs apply and the right way to grade the standard of the choice. Firms similar to\u00a0<strong>Mercor Inc.\u00a0<\/strong>sit on this expert-teaching lane, helping create rubrics and evaluations that could be used to coach and assess agents. This is essential because many business decisions should not deterministic. The foundations may conflict. The evidence could also be incomplete. External context may change the reply. When that happens, agents need greater than access to documents \u2013 they need examples of how experts reason.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Layer 4<\/strong>\u00a0is where that institutional memory turns into\u00a0<strong>guidance<\/strong>. The system synthesizes prior expert reasoning, deterministic business rules and the present state of the business into recommendations. In some cases, the arrogance can be high enough for an agent to act. In other cases, the system will surface the evidence and ask a human to make the decision. Either way, the result feeds back into\u00a0<strong>Layer 5<\/strong>, where the\u00a0<strong>decision<\/strong>, the\u00a0<strong>reasoning\u00a0<\/strong>and the\u00a0<strong>end result\u00a0<\/strong>turn into a part of the educational loop.<\/p>\n<p>The takeaway is that the System of Intelligence just isn&#8217;t only a semantic layer or a catalog. It&#8217;s a living system that captures knowledge, reasoned judgment, agent behavior and feedback. These layers explain why data platforms, observability vendors, model makers and agent frameworks are all converging on the identical territory. The chance for purchasers is lock-in. If the agent platform owns the observability, the evals, the memory and the educational loop, switching models or platforms becomes extremely difficult. That&#8217;s the reason enterprises should think twice about who owns these layers and the way portable this intelligence can be over time.<\/p>\n<p>Our closing view is that non-public agents will spark the productivity boom in enterprise AI, but enterprise advantage will ultimately come from learning systems. The firms that win will capture how work gets done, how decisions are made, how agents reason and the way the business improves from every interaction. That&#8217;s the inspiration for moving from personal productivity to organizational intelligence.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"h-action-item\" class=\"wp-block-heading\">Motion item: Construct the enterprise intelligence architecture before agent sprawl hardens<\/h3>\n<p>Chief AI officers should encourage bottom-up adoption of non-public agents, but only inside a top-down architecture that stops a brand new generation of intelligence silos. Every agent, skill, workflow and data product that proves useful must have a path to turn into a governed enterprise asset \u2013 tied to common identity, shared ontology, data governance, policy, observability, evals and audit trails. The mandate just isn&#8217;t to slow experimentation; it&#8217;s to make certain local productivity gains feed organizational intelligence quite than disconnected pockets of automation.<\/p>\n<p>The most important trap is letting each department \u2013 or worse, each vendor \u2013 define its own system of intelligence. Frontier models are critical, however the enterprise operating context can&#8217;t be outsourced blindly to a model maker\u2019s bundled agent environment. The Chief AI officer\u2019s job is to work in concert with the business and technical teams to define the architecture where agents can reason and act safely across the business. Shared data definitions, business rules, process context, agent traces, learning loops and governance needs to be incorporated intentionally. Personal agents light the fuse; the enterprise-wide System of Intelligence determines whether that energy becomes a durable advantage or one other silo problem moving at machine speed.<\/p>\n<h5>Image: theCUBE Research\/ChatGPT<\/h5>\n<h6><em>Disclaimer:\u00a0All statements made regarding corporations or securities are strictly beliefs, points of view and opinions held by SiliconANGLE Media, Enterprise Technology Research, other guests on theCUBE and guest writers. Such statements should not recommendations by these individuals to purchase, sell or hold any security. The content presented doesn&#8217;t constitute investment advice and mustn&#8217;t be used as the premise for any investment decision. You and only you&#8217;re accountable for your investment decisions.<\/em><\/h6>\n<h6><em>Disclosure: Lots of the corporations cited in Breaking Evaluation are sponsors of theCUBE and\/or clients of theCUBE Research. None of those firms or other corporations have any editorial control over or advanced viewing of what\u2019s published in Breaking Evaluation.<\/em><\/h6>\n<div class=\"silic-after-content\" id=\"silic-1469270449\">\n<hr style=\"border: 1px solid; color: #d8d8d8; height: 0px; margin-top: 20px;\"\/>\n<p>Support our mission to maintain content open and free by engaging with theCUBE community. <strong>Join theCUBE\u2019s Alumni Trust Network<\/strong>, where technology leaders connect, share intelligence and create opportunities.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"text-xl md:text-2xl text-gray-300 mb-8 max-w-4xl mx-auto\" data-replit-metadata=\"client\/src\/pages\/Home.tsx:123:12\" data-component-name=\"p\"><strong>15M+ viewers of theCUBE videos<\/strong>, powering conversations across AI, cloud, cybersecurity and more<\/li>\n<li data-replit-metadata=\"client\/src\/pages\/Home.tsx:123:12\" data-component-name=\"p\"><strong>11.4k+ theCUBE alumni<\/strong> \u2014 Connect with greater than 11,400 tech and business leaders shaping the long run through a singular trusted-based network.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<div class=\"grid grid-cols-2 md:grid-cols-4 gap-6 mb-12 max-w-4xl mx-auto\" data-replit-metadata=\"client\/src\/pages\/Home.tsx:126:12\" data-component-name=\"div\">\n<div class=\"text-center\" data-replit-metadata=\"client\/src\/pages\/Home.tsx:142:14\" data-component-name=\"div\">\n<p><strong>About SiliconANGLE Media<\/strong><\/p>\n<div style=\"text-align: left;\" data-replit-metadata=\"client\/src\/pages\/Home.tsx:145:16\" data-component-name=\"div\">SiliconANGLE Media is a recognized leader in digital media innovation, uniting breakthrough technology, strategic insights and real-time audience engagement. Because the parent company of SiliconANGLE, <a href=\"https:\/\/cts.businesswire.com\/ct\/CT?id=smartlink&#038;url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.thecube.net%2F&#038;esheet=54119777&#038;newsitemid=20240910506833&#038;lan=en-US&#038;anchor=theCUBE+Network&#038;index=10&#038;md5=7de2a85f95ab4a4a495cede20b8cb1da\">theCUBE Network<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/cts.businesswire.com\/ct\/CT?id=smartlink&#038;url=https%3A%2F%2Fthecuberesearch.com%2F&#038;esheet=54119777&#038;newsitemid=20240910506833&#038;lan=en-US&#038;anchor=theCUBE+Research&#038;index=11&#038;md5=7bb33676722925eb57d588ec343e4f6f\">theCUBE Research<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/cts.businesswire.com\/ct\/CT?id=smartlink&#038;url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cube365.net%2F&#038;esheet=54119777&#038;newsitemid=20240910506833&#038;lan=en-US&#038;anchor=CUBE365&#038;index=12&#038;md5=d310fb35919714e66ad8d42c9c0c1bc6\">CUBE365<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/cts.businesswire.com\/ct\/CT?id=smartlink&#038;url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.thecubeai.com%2F&#038;esheet=54119777&#038;newsitemid=20240910506833&#038;lan=en-US&#038;anchor=theCUBE+AI&#038;index=13&#038;md5=b8b98472f8071b23ebb10ab9a8dd0683\">theCUBE AI<\/a> and theCUBE SuperStudios \u2014 with flagship locations in Silicon Valley and the Recent York Stock Exchange \u2014 SiliconANGLE Media operates on the intersection of media, technology and AI.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Founded by tech visionaries John Furrier and Dave Vellante, SiliconANGLE Media has built a dynamic ecosystem of industry-leading digital media brands that reach 15+ million elite tech professionals. Our latest proprietary theCUBE AI Video Cloud is breaking ground in audience interaction, leveraging theCUBEai.com neural network to assist technology corporations make data-driven decisions and stay on the forefront of industry conversations.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n<p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The unreal intelligence wave is beginning to look a bit just like the pc era \u2013 with some obvious differences. The primary similarity is personal productivity. Individuals are taking control of their very own work with agents, open tools and repeatable skills, very like power users once did with spreadsheets, word processors, presentation graphics and [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":343441,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[10],"tags":[2231,9841,6335,3088,969,2927,11418,4702],"class_list":["post-343440","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-technology","tag-agents","tag-databricks","tag-fuse","tag-light","tag-move","tag-personal","tag-snowflake","tag-stack"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ebiztoday.news\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/343440","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ebiztoday.news\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ebiztoday.news\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ebiztoday.news\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ebiztoday.news\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=343440"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/ebiztoday.news\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/343440\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":343443,"href":"https:\/\/ebiztoday.news\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/343440\/revisions\/343443"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ebiztoday.news\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/343441"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ebiztoday.news\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=343440"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ebiztoday.news\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=343440"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ebiztoday.news\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=343440"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}