{"id":346474,"date":"2026-06-06T09:27:18","date_gmt":"2026-06-06T03:57:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ebiztoday.news\/?p=346474"},"modified":"2026-06-06T09:27:18","modified_gmt":"2026-06-06T03:57:18","slug":"who-might-be-in-on-detroit-red-wings-dylan-larkin-who-makes-sense","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ebiztoday.news\/index.php\/2026\/06\/06\/who-might-be-in-on-detroit-red-wings-dylan-larkin-who-makes-sense\/","title":{"rendered":"Who Might be in on Detroit Red Wings Dylan Larkin? Who Makes Sense?"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

It\u2019s likely not the beginning to the offseason that the Detroit Red Wings had in mind<\/strong><\/h2>\n

Sportsnet<\/a><\/strong>: Elliotte Friedman on 32 Thoughts: The Podcast \u2013 To Challenge of To not Challenge? episode on what teams might be on Detroit Red Wings Dylan Larkin<\/a>. Which teams make sense for the No. 1 center.<\/p>\n

** NHLRumors.com transcription<\/em><\/p>\n

\u201cProbably the most fascinating thing he\u2019s going to do here is, is he going to attempt to trade him for pieces that can help them now, or is he going to do one other form of, I\u2019ll do futures or younger players who is perhaps able to play, but they\u2019re just younger and more inexperienced, and construct this team now around Moritz Seider and Lucas Raymond.<\/p>\n

NHL Rumors: Activity Starting To Pick Up Across the League<\/a><\/p>\n

It\u2019s, I feel, it\u2019s possible that he, because a few of these teams might say, look, we\u2019re getting Dylan Larkin to win, and we are able to\u2019t add him after which subtract.<\/p>\n

So, on the very least Yzerman goes to be looking around and saying, what if we get good players who’re younger and we’ve got to delay our window again. In order that\u2019ll be an interesting selection for him.<\/p>\n

I\u2019ll say this: Larkin has a no-trade clause this 12 months and next, so he has, so he has control. For those who\u2019re a rebuilding team, like a San Jose or a Chicago, I can be, I can be curious to see if he really wanted to try this.<\/p>\n

Like San Jose. It\u2019s got to be so tempting to take a look at (Macklin) Celebrini and say, \u2018Wow, I\u2019d like to play with that guy for a couple of years.\u2019 But they\u2019re still distant, right? Or farther away, is he really going to want to go away a team that\u2019s been on the precipice of the playoffs for the last couple years and haven\u2019t made it in for teams which are a bit of bit farther away. Although San Jose might be, San Jose is the one team I form of wonder about, would they give the impression of being at otherwise?<\/p>\n

But teams like Chicago, like even a team like Recent Jersey, which has been within the playoffs and won, does he think they\u2019re close enough to winning? Because I do know a whole lot of people suspect Recent Jersey would make a whole lot of sense.<\/p>\n

I\u2019m taking a look at Dallas, I\u2019m taking a look at Tampa Bay. I don\u2019t know that Florida could do that, but I feel you mostly have to take a look at them.<\/p>\n

NHL Rumors: Dylan Larkin and Darnell Nurse<\/a><\/p>\n

But I feel the primary team everybody\u2019s taking a look at is Minnesota. This has the Wild written throughout it. I don\u2019t think Dallas is inconceivable. I don\u2019t think Tampa is inconceivable. I don\u2019t know that he\u2019s going to return to Canada, but Minnesota is the one team everyone\u2019s talking about.<\/p>\n

\u2026<\/p>\n

But like there\u2019s, there\u2019s a deal there. It\u2019s like (Danila) Yurov, (Charlie) Stramel, who knows what else. It makes an excessive amount of sense. But you recognize, I mean, it\u2019s as much as Yzerman, and it\u2019s as much as Larkin.<\/p>\n

We needed to restart our X account. Please follow @MyNHLRumorsX<\/a><\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

Have you ever\u00a0subscribed to our YouTube channel<\/a>? Rumor roundups and hot topics from across the league. We\u2019re also posting some stuff on Instagram<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n

For those who love our reporting, select NHLrumors.com as a preferred source on Google.<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n