{"id":350198,"date":"2026-06-13T13:34:31","date_gmt":"2026-06-13T08:04:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ebiztoday.news\/?p=350198"},"modified":"2026-06-13T13:34:31","modified_gmt":"2026-06-13T08:04:31","slug":"ryan-reynolds-faces-latest-court-fight-over-tesla-crash","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ebiztoday.news\/index.php\/2026\/06\/13\/ryan-reynolds-faces-latest-court-fight-over-tesla-crash\/","title":{"rendered":"Ryan Reynolds Faces Latest Court Fight Over Tesla Crash"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/p>\n

\n

Courtroom headlines proceed to follow Ryan Reynolds<\/strong> and Blake Energetic<\/strong>.<\/p>\n

Just as attention surrounding Energetic\u2019s legal battle with Justin Baldoni<\/strong> began to chill, a separate lawsuit has pulled Reynolds right into a latest dispute.<\/p>\n

The actor\u2019s company is now tied to a multi-million-dollar case stemming from a traffic accident in Manhattan, with two women claiming they suffered serious injuries in the course of the crash.<\/p>\n

Steven Bergman\/AFF-USA.COM \/ MEGA <\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

The legal battle centers on a March 2024 collision involving a Tesla owned by Reynolds and a Toyota van operated by Access-A-Ride, a transportation service for disabled passengers.<\/p>\n

In response to court documents obtained by the Day by day Mail<\/a><\/em>, Bronx residents Kawanna Coleman, 54, and Taji Kelly, 53, have each filed lawsuits connected to the accident. Together, the claims seek roughly $5 million in damages.<\/p>\n

Although Reynolds was not contained in the Tesla on the time of the crash, the vehicle was allegedly being driven by certainly one of his employees in Lower Manhattan.<\/p>\n

The lawsuits also name Access-A-Ride and the van\u2019s driver, Nasriddinov Nodirjon, as defendants.<\/p>\n

While Reynolds\u2019 name appears on the Tesla\u2019s insurance paperwork and he’s the registered owner of the vehicle, the legal motion was filed against his company, 2382 Walker Holdings LLC, slightly than against him personally.<\/p>\n

Questions Surround The Early Morning Crash<\/h2>\n
\"Ryan
Lumeimages \/ MEGA <\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

The collision reportedly occurred on March 2, 2024, in Latest York City\u2019s TriBeCa neighborhood.<\/p>\n

Court filings allege that the Tesla, which had only recently been purchased, modified lanes in front of the Access-A-Ride vehicle before allegedly stopping suddenly at a traffic light.<\/p>\n

The lawsuit claims wet road conditions and rain made it difficult for the van\u2019s driver to stop in time, leading to a rear-end collision.<\/p>\n

Photos reportedly taken after the crash showed substantial damage to each vehicles. The Tesla allegedly suffered dents and scratches to its rear section, while the Toyota sustained heavy front-end damage, including a detached grille and a bent hood.<\/p>\n

The filings accuse each drivers of \u201cnegligence, carelessness and recklessness\u201d in reference to the incident.<\/p>\n

At this stage, the allegations remain claims contained in court documents and haven’t been proven in court.<\/p>\n

Ryan Reynolds Company Pushes Back Against Claims<\/h2>\n
\"Ryan
OConnor\/AFF-USA.com \/ MEGA <\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

The 2 women involved within the case allege they suffered significant injuries because of this of the collision.<\/p>\n

In response to Kelly\u2019s lawsuit, she sustained \u201csevere and everlasting personal injuries\u201d following the accident.<\/p>\n

Coleman\u2019s filing alleges she suffered \u201cinjuries to varied parts of her head, body, limbs and nervous system,\u201d with the injuries reportedly requiring hospitalization and prolonged bed rest.<\/p>\n

To defend against the claims, Reynolds\u2019 company has retained distinguished Latest York law firm, Wade Clark Mulcahy.<\/p>\n

Court filings from the defense argue that the ladies weren’t wearing seatbelts on the time of the crash and contend that this contributed to their alleged injuries.<\/p>\n

The case has also develop into more complicated since the Latest York Transit Authority and the Metropolitan Transportation Authority were named as defendants.<\/p>\n

Nevertheless, each agencies are searching for to withdraw from the litigation, arguing that neither the vehicle involved nor its driver was officially registered with the Access-A-Ride program.<\/p>\n