<\/p>\n
Jeff Bezos Desires to Construct an \u2018Artificial General Engineer\u2019<\/strong><\/a>Cade Metz | The Latest York Times ($)<\/em><\/p>\n “‘All societal wealth is driven by invention,’ [Bezos] said in an interview with The Latest York Times. ‘Six thousand years ago, anyone invented the plow, and all of us got wealthier. Then, much later, anyone invented the steam engine, and all of us got wealthier.’ …’What Prometheus seeks to do,’ he added, ‘is to supply a set of tools that dramatically accelerates that invention loop.'”<\/p>\n<\/div>\n Why Orbital Data Centers Are Harder Than Silicon Valley Thinks<\/strong><\/a>Andrew Cavalier | IEEE Spectrum<\/em><\/p>\n “Proponents tout the various wonders of computing in space: abundant solar energy, free cooling, and freedom from Earth-based disturbances like earthquakes, floods, and protesters. But a sober have a look at the physics of space-based computing paints a way more nuanced picture.”<\/p>\n<\/div>\n Longevity Startup Doses First Human in Bid to Reverse Age-Related Sight Loss<\/strong><\/a>Isabella Ward | Wired ($)<\/em><\/p>\n “It’s the first-ever cellular-rejuvenation therapy using this technology to receive FDA clearance to enter human clinical trials, and hence the primary likelihood to check whether the technology can ‘ameliorate human disease,’ in accordance with Life Biosciences cofounder David Sinclair, who can also be a professor of genetics at Harvard Medical School.”<\/p>\n<\/div>\n AI Absolutism Is Breaking Our Brains. The Apocalyptic Future We\u2019re Being Sold Isn\u2019t Inevitable<\/strong><\/a>Samantha Oltman | The Guardian<\/em><\/p>\n “Contradictory as they might be, all these arguments and anxieties fit neatly into the overarching message of the people constructing this technology: AI\u2019s dominance is inevitable. Get on board otherwise you can be left behind. …[But] the version of AI that we\u2019re being sold doesn\u2019t should be the version we buy. Nor does it must be the story we consider in.”<\/p>\n<\/div>\n Commonwealth Fusion Makes the Physics Case for Its 400 MW Reactor<\/strong><\/a>John Timmer | Ars Technica<\/em><\/p>\n “In response to our greatest models, developed using real-world data from multiple tokamaks, ARC should have the option to repeatedly trigger fusion reactions that release more energy than we put into them. But there\u2019s ‘working’ from a physics perspective, and ‘working’ from a market perspective. …the funds are going to be the toughest risk to retire and should require having ARC operate for a long time before we’ve got a definitive answer.”<\/p>\n<\/div>\n Google DeepMind Is Frightened About What Happens When Tens of millions of Agents Begin to Interact<\/strong><\/a>Will Douglas Heaven | MIT Technology Review ($)<\/em><\/p>\n “In response to Rohin Shah, who directs the corporate\u2019s AGI safety and alignment research, the mass-market arrival of agents that may perform tasks without human oversight and follow instructions given to them by other agents creates a complete latest class of risk.”<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\nComputing<\/h4>\n
Biotechnology<\/h4>\n
Future<\/h4>\n
Energy<\/h4>\n
Artificial Intelligence<\/h4>\n
Future<\/h4>\n