<\/p>\n
This interview is a component of <\/em>Workology\u2019s HR highlight series<\/em>, where we highlight influential HR leaders who’re shaping the long run of labor through daring ideas and real-world impact. For this post, we\u2019re talking to Rhona Barnett-Pierce, Founding father of Workfluencer Media.<\/em><\/p>\n Rhona Barnett-Pierce is the founding father of Workfluencer Media<\/a>, where she helps Talent Acquisition and HR leaders amplify their influence through strategic video and content creation. With a background leading Talent Acquisition teams across Talent Marketplaces, SaaS, and Media, Rhona brings a novel mix of recruiting expertise, employer branding insight, and private branding technique to the long run of talent attraction. She can be the host of the Workfluencer Podcast<\/a>, where she highlights the true stories of execs using authentic content to shape the long run of labor.<\/p>\n Known for her engaging approach and practical insights, Rhona makes a speciality of helping recruiters and HR leaders construct trust, credibility, and meaningful connections through storytelling and short-form video content. Her work focuses on empowering Talent Acquisition professionals to develop into confident content creators who stand out online while staying true to their authentic voice. Whether she\u2019s coaching leaders on personal branding, designing thought leadership strategies, or leading workshops on content creation, Rhona is enthusiastic about transforming how organizations connect with talent in a more human and impactful way. Connect with Rhona on LinkedIn<\/a> or follow her newsletter<\/a> for insights on recruiting, branding, and the evolving world of labor.<\/p>\n I didn\u2019t figure this out as a recruiter. I figured it out because the candidate no one was calling back. After I moved to the US from Panama, I\u2019d left an actual profession behind. I\u2019d quit my job as a Regional Operations Manager at a software company, landed in Tulsa, after which went years and not using a single interview. I wasn\u2019t getting rejections, I used to be getting silence. All anyone had was a resume: a reputation they couldn\u2019t place, a location, an inventory of corporations they\u2019d never heard of. So that they filled within the blanks and moved on.<\/p>\n So in 2013 I recorded a 90-second video about my background and added one line to the duvet letter field on every application: \u201cPlease watch this short video to learn more about me.\u201d I didn\u2019t change a thing about my resume; same titles, same \u201cunknown\u201d corporations, and the interviews began coming, because people could finally see me and stopped guessing. Years later I watched the very same thing work from the hiring side, after I suggested that a hiring manager create a 90-second video for a job we were struggling to fill. The video pulled in additional qualified applicants than the previous three job ads combined. That\u2019s when content stopped being my personal hack and have become my talent attraction and retention strategy.<\/p>\n Here\u2019s my full talk at RecFest USA 2025 titled Every Story is a Recruiting Story<\/a>. I shared more about my story there and the way teams can find stories in on a regular basis moments.\u00a0<\/p>\n The most important mistake is ignoring the most effective content you\u2019ve got: your individual employees. Corporations pour budget into polished content from marketing, recruiting, the brand team, and candidates can smell it. No one trusts the official account. People trust people, specifically those within the trenches actually doing the work. Your engineer talking about what she\u2019s constructing is value greater than any careers page, because she has nothing to sell and no reason to spin it.<\/p>\n So the true mistake is sitting on that. Corporations lock their employees down, route the whole lot through approvals, and tell people to remain off LinkedIn as an alternative of letting them post. What they needs to be doing is the other: giving employees the liberty to share online in their very own voice, unscripted, even when it\u2019s messy. That\u2019s employee-generated content, and it\u2019s essentially the most credible thing an organization can put out. The businesses that get this don\u2019t manufacture trust, they let the individuals who have already got it do the talking.<\/p>\n The loudest one immediately is people treating a private brand as profession insurance. The last couple of years have been brutal in corporate America, and HR and TA have taken a few of the worst of it. The people I discuss with watched it occur, or it happened to them, they usually got here out of it unwilling to have a single point of failure again. So that they\u2019re constructing portfolio careers: multiple income streams, monetizing their very own expertise as an alternative of renting it to 1 employer. That appears like brand partnerships, speaking, consulting, coaching, fractional work, even launching their very own products. And almost every one in every of those paths starts the identical way, with being intentional about your presence online and the content you place out. The content is what attracts the opportunities.<\/p>\n The opposite theme I keep hearing is a backlash against sameness. As everyone leans on AI to supply more, most of it’s beginning to sound equivalent, and the people actually breaking through are those with an actual viewpoint and an actual face attached to it. That connects back to the primary theme, because constructing a brand should never be about stopping a layoff. There\u2019s really nothing you may do as an worker to regulate being laid off. What you may control is what you\u2019ve built on the side and who already knows your work if you need it. That\u2019s what a private brand really is: not protection from the hit, but a head start on what comes next.<\/p>\n AI lowered the barrier to producing content to mainly zero, and the very first thing that did was flood everyone\u2019s feed with sameness. Recruiters and HR teams can now generate per week of posts in a day, and a variety of them are, so candidates are scrolling past an ocean of content that\u2019s technically wonderful and completely forgettable. The irony is that the more everyone leans on AI to scale, the more precious a real human voice becomes<\/a>, since it\u2019s the one thing that stands out. I\u2019ve began calling the individuals who chase visibility this manner with none real viewpoint \u201cFluffluencers.\u201d A lot of output, nothing behind it.<\/p>\n So the best way I see it, AI raised the stakes on being real somewhat than lowering them. It\u2019s an amazing tool for the parts that needs to be invisible, the editing, the repurposing, the primary rough draft you\u2019ll rewrite anyway. Where it goes mistaken is when people let it generate the actual considering, because candidates can feel when there\u2019s nobody there. The recruiters and HR pros who\u2019ll win with AI are those using it to remove busywork so that they have more time to say something only they may say. Those who use it to avoid having a viewpoint are going to mix into the noise.<\/p>\n My predominant prediction is pretty easy: should you\u2019re not leaning on actual human voices, your employees, creators, customers, you\u2019re going to struggle to draw people. And I don\u2019t think that\u2019s a daring take, I feel it\u2019s just where the whole lot is already headed. Take a look at how anything gets marketed now. Products, services, software, all of it runs on real people talking to real people, because that\u2019s who we trust. Hiring has all the time followed consumer marketing trends, and it all the time will, for the plain reason that we\u2019re hiring humans. The brand account doesn\u2019t move people anymore. The person does.<\/p>\n So personal branding and content continue to grow in hiring not since it\u2019s a clever recruiting tactic, but since it\u2019s how the entire world now decides what to trust and who to hearken to. The businesses that get this can have their people visible and talking, in their very own voices, well before a candidate ever lands on a job posting. Everyone else will keep wondering why their roles aren\u2019t attracting anyone while their competitors quietly develop into the place people already feel like they know. That\u2019s the shift. It\u2019s probably not about recruiting in any respect. It\u2019s about catching as much as how people already make decisions.<\/p>\n Rhona Barnett-Pierce on LinkedIn<\/a><\/p>\n Workfluencer Media<\/a>\u00a0<\/p>\n Workfluencer Podcast<\/a>\u00a0<\/p>\n5 Questions With Rhona Barnett-Pierce<\/h2>\n
You\u2019ve built a profession on the intersection of Talent Acquisition and content creation. What made you realize content was becoming essential to modern recruiting?<\/h3>\n
What are the most important mistakes corporations make when attempting to create recruiting or employer brand content?<\/h3>\n
Through your podcast, you\u2019ve talked with professionals shaping the long run of labor through content. What themes or trends are you hearing repeatedly immediately?<\/h3>\n
How has AI modified the best way recruiters and HR professionals approach content creation, branding, and candidate engagement?<\/h3>\n
Looking ahead, how do you see personal branding and content creation continuing to influence hiring, recruiting, and the candidate experience over the following few years?<\/h3>\n
RESOURCES<\/h2>\n