Washington Sundar endured one other disappointing outing with each bat and ball during Team India’s shocking 34-run defeat to Ireland in the primary T20I in Belfast on Friday, June 26. The all-rounder gave away 19 runs in his only over and scored just nine runs off 12 balls within the chase, drawing criticism from fans and experts.
Sundar has continued to receive backing across formats within the Gautam Gambhir era. While he has proven worthwhile within the Test setup, particularly following Ravichandran Ashwin’s retirement, his performances in white-ball cricket have told a special story.
His stock within the limited-overs formats has steadily declined with each series, along with his underwhelming numbers raising serious concerns. With crucial assignments ahead for Team India and a number of other all-round options waiting within the wings, the team management may soon must reconsider the prolonged run they’ve afforded Sundar.
With that in mind, listed below are three key the explanation why Washington Sundar now not appears to suit into Team India’s white-ball plans following the IRE vs IND 2026 first T20I.
#1 Unclear role and underwhelming execution
Within the 26 T20I innings that Washington Sundar has batted, he has been shuffled across five different batting positions, yet the returns have remained underwhelming. With a median of 16.12 and a strike rate of 129.25, he has not done enough to justify promotion up the order or to be trusted with ending responsibilities.
His bowling numbers may appear comparatively higher, but there stays considerable uncertainty regarding his exact role in India’s attack. Whether he’s viewed as a powerplay bowler, a backup option, or a matchup specialist against left-handers stays unclear, even after 61 T20I appearances since his debut in 2017.
The uncertainty around Washington Sundar’s role has grown under Gautam Gambhir, with the all-rounder completing his full quota in just three of 11 T20Is for the reason that India tour of Sri Lanka 2024. His inconsistent usage and limited impact have raised serious questions over his place within the squad.
#2 An unclear and ineffective batting strategy
Washington Sundar has struggled to make a meaningful impact in any batting role in T20Is, whether as a floater, an anchor under pressure, or a finisher. His batting issues with Gujarat Titans, where he has found it difficult to adapt to a promoted middle-order role, have also carried over to Team India.
Sundar has neither shown the power to take care of tempo when promoted up the order nor displayed the consistent explosiveness required of a finisher. In India’s current setup, where every player has a clearly defined role, he appears misplaced.
In ODIs, Washington Sundar struggled in the center order, failing to rotate strike or rating timely boundaries. Since Gautam Gambhir took over, Sundar has scored just 126 runs in his last 10 ODI innings at a median of 14 and a strike rate of 78.75, a pointy decline after a formidable begin to his ODI profession.
#3 Not adding enough to the team’s balance or depth
Washington Sundar’s inclusion as an all-round option within the playing XI is supposed so as to add balance, depth, and flexibility to the side. Nonetheless, those advantages have largely remained theoretical, with little evidence of his presence significantly improving the team’s on-field performance.
And not using a clearly defined role or impactful performances, it is tough to find out how Sundar offers more value than the alternatives waiting on the bench. His selection also forces Team India to compromise on a specialist, which at times has proven more costly than the added depth he is predicted to offer.
With India’s upcoming white-ball assignments set to be played outside the subcontinent, Sundar appears to be in an increasingly difficult position as he looks to retain his place within the limited-overs squads.
Get the most recent cricket news here, like us on Facebook, and follow us on Twitter and Instagram for more such updates.