Members of the Union of European Football Associations (UEFA) are threatening to boycott FIFA World Cup tournaments following a virtual emergency meeting among the many soccer body’s 55 member nations.
A boycott would see top European contenders comparable to France, England, Portugal and Spain, the sporting event’s recently crowned world champions, out of future men’s or women’s FIFA World Cup tournaments. The subsequent scheduled FIFA tournament is the ladies’s under-20 World Cup hosted by Poland, starting on Sept. 5.
Just over two weeks after the 2026 World Cup tournament wrapped up, which resulted in a record income of about $12 billion, what led to this breakdown?
What triggered the threat?
FIFA president Gianni Infantino announced a plan to create a $20-billion company with private investors on Tuesday, which might form a industrial subsidiary called FIFA Forward Enterprise (FFE).
The FFE would run competitions, including the World Cup, and would “invite third parties to make minority, non-controlling investments” into the corporate.
FIFA said in a press release the FFE would raise as much as $4.2 billion later this 12 months to assist fund development programs “based on an initial equity valuation of $20 billion by fastidiously choosing long-term investors who will purchase minority, non-controlling interests.”
“That is concerning the democratization of football worldwide,” Infantino said within the statement, which added that “a consultation process has begun.”
Nonetheless, if Infantino’s plan is approved, American enterprise capital firm Thrive Everlasting is predicted to steer the proposed investor group for FFE, which was founded by Joshua Kushner — the brother of U.S. President Donald Trump’s son-in-law Jared.
Banking institution J.P. Morgan is currently advising the world football’s governing body.
What could be the following steps?
To be enacted, the plan must be passed by a vote of FIFA’s 211 members. Infantino has also written to members that they are going to receive $40 million (30 million kilos) because of this of accepting his plan.
A deadline of Sept. 19 has been set for federations to reply and gain access to an initial $20 million (15 million kilos).
How has the UEFA reacted?
In a press release released on Thursday, the UEFA “unanimously and unequivocally reject FIFA’s proposal to transfer ownership interests within the World Cup and other FIFA competitions to personal investors.”
Get breaking National news
Get breaking Canada news delivered to your inbox because it happens so you will not miss a trending story.
“The World Cup can’t be treated as an investment product. It’s considered one of football’s best sporting legacies. It has been built over generations by players, national teams and supporters across every continent,” the statement reads. “No a part of it should ever be surrendered to personal investors.”
“Because of this of today’s discussion, no UEFA national teams will take part in any FIFA competition for as long as these proposals remain alive, unless this proposal has been abandoned in its entirety and binding assurances have been provided that FIFA won’t ever again open its governance or competitions to personal ownership.”
The statement also reads: “Some things are just too essential to sell. The FIFA World Cup belongs to football. It all the time will. And as long as Europe has a voice, it can never be on the market.”
The statement got here after the UEFA held an emergency virtual meeting Thursday, chaired by its president Aleksander Ceferin.
Tuesday’s announcement is the second time Infantino has attempted this type of cope with private investors. In 2018, he proposed a secretive $25 billion offer with SoftBank of Japan that was set to span over 12 years.
Infantino desired to create latest global competitions, including an expanded men’s World Cup, seemingly backed by Saudi Arabian money. The plan failed following severe backlash from UEFA.
Despite this, Infantino built closer ties to Saudi Arabia’s Crown Prince Mohammed Bin Salman, with the nation currently set to host the 2034 World Cup.
Infantino was already under the microscope during this 12 months’s World Cup after communication with Trump regarding a red card handed out to American player Folarin Balogun within the U.S. match against Bosnia and Herzegovina on July 1.
Balogun was sent off directly for planting his cleated foot on the ankle of Bosnia and Herzegovina defender Tarik Muharemovic during a 2-0 win for the U.S. within the round of 32, a challenge that had been a routine red card all season in competitions worldwide and that has, in some past cases, resulted in a two-game ban for serious foul play.
Trump said on the time he didn’t pressure FIFA to overturn the decision, saying he “didn’t tell them what to do” and “can’t tell them what to do.”
Infantino’s statement on the matter says that “FIFA’s judicial bodies are independent.”
Can Infantino survive latest calls for removal?
Infantino’s latest gamble has the potential to finish his 11-year run as FIFA president, because the Nov. 18 deadline for potential candidates to declare a presidential vote with FIFA members looms. The vote is scheduled for March 2027.
One other term could be his last as FIFA’s leader, which might last until 2031.
The 61-year-old has already received pushback from FIFA members regarding his re-election, with the German Football Association probably the most notable nation to be amongst a handful of members refusing to sign a letter to place forth Infantino as a candidate for an additional term.
© 2026 Global News, a division of Corus Entertainment Inc.